Main Article Content

Hanan Faisal Ghazi
hananfaisalgh2022@gmail.com
Abid Hmood Ali
hananfaisalgh2022@gmail.com

Abstract

The current study attempts to investigate Iraqi EFL learners' recognition of impoliteness strategies according to their gender, age, and place of residence. As associated with this aim, the study hypothesizes that there is no statistically significant difference between the calculated value and the tabulated value of the recognition test of impoliteness strategies used by Iraqi EFL learners according to their gender, age, and place of residence. A test, which is the source of the data, is used to test the hypotheses of the study. A sample of 140 Iraqi EFL college students at the fourth year stage, Department of English, College of Education of Human Sciences, University of Tikrit, participated in responding to the test. The data collected from the test is analyzed according to Culpeper (1996). The results of this study indicate that gender, age, and place of residence affect Iraqi EFL learners' recognition of impoliteness strategies.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

How to Cite
Ghazi, H. F., & Ali, A. H. (2023). Iraqi EFL Learners’ Recognition of Impoliteness Strategies. Journal of Tikrit University for Humanities, 30(3, 2), 42–62. https://doi.org/10.25130/jtuh.30.3.2.2023.23
Section
Articles

References

AlKhazaali, M. & Al-Hindawi, F. (2016). Impoliteness in Political Conflicts on Terrorism. Germany: LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing

Ambuyo, Beverlyne A., Florence N., Indede & Peter N. Karanja (2011). ''Face threatening acts and standing orders: Politeness or politics in the question time discussions of the Kenyan parliament''. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, vol. 1(9):209-18.

Culpeper, J. (1996). ''Towards An Anatomy of Impoliteness''. Journal of Pragmatics. vol. 25: 349-367.

_________ (2008). Reflections on Impoliteness, relational work and power. In Bousfield, Derek & Locher, Miriam A. (eds.), Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice 18_44. Berlin and New York : Mouton de Gruyter.

_________ (2011). Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Culpeper, J., D. Bousfield, A. Wichmann. (2003). ''Impoliteness Revisited: With Special Reference to Dynamic and Prosodic Aspects''. Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 35(10_11): 1545_1579.

Eelen, G. (2001). A Critique of Politeness Theories. London: St Jerome Publishing Manchester, UK & Northampton MA.

Ibrahim, A. H. (2020). A Socio-Linguistic Analysis of Impoliteness in Political Tweets. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, Vol. 11(1): 64-79.

Laitinen, M. (2011). BREAKING THE RULES OF COMMUNICATION: Verbal and nonverbal impoliteness in the American hospital drama House. M.D. Master's thesis, University of Jyvaskyla, Department of Language English.

Locher, M. A., & Bousfield, D. (2008). Introduction: Impoliteness and Power in Language. In Bousfield, Derek & Locher, Miriam A. (eds.), Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice 1_13. Berlin and New York : Mouton de Gruyter.

Mugford, G. (2007). ''How rude! Teaching Impoliteness in the Second-language Classroom''. ELT Journal Volume 62(4): 375-84.

Muhi, M. H.(2015). A Developmental Pragmatic Study of the Speech Acts of Request and Apology in Iraqi EFL Learners' Performance. Unpublished Ph. D. Dissertation. University Of Baghdad.

Al-Juburi, H. H. and Abdulrahman, E. M. (2018). A Socio-Pragmatic Study of Impoliteness in William Wycherley's Comedy: The Plain Dealer. Journal Tikrit University for Humanities, 25(5): 1-21.

Naji, H. A. (2020). Politeness in Dicken's tale of two cities. Journal Tikrit University for Humanities, 27(3): 1-10.

Rahardi, R. K. (2017). ''Linguistic Impoliteness in the Sociopragmatic Perspective''. HUMANIORA, Vol. 29 (14): 309-315.

Sell, R. D.(2005). Literary Texts and Dichronic Aspects of Politeness.

Tracy, K.,& Tracy, S.J. (1998). ''Rudeness at 911: Reconceptualizing face and face attack''. Human Communication Research, 25(2): 225-251.