Discursive Strategies Representing Ideology and Social Power in Stokett’s The Help: A Critical Discourse Analysis
Main Article Content
Abstract
Writers of literary texts rely on multiple linguistic methods and structures, explicitly or implicitly, to reveal their ideas. This study tends to uncover the discursive strategies employed in Stockett’s The Help from a Critical Discourse Analysis perspective. The current study aims to: 1) Showing the discursive strategies in the novel under study. 2) Pinpointing the discursive strategies employed in revealing ideologies in the novel under investigation. 3) Finding out the discursive strategies used in revealing social power in the novel under study.
A number of texts that contain various discursive strategies have been selected for analysis. To fulfill the above aims, the study hypothesizes that: 1) certain discursive strategies are used in the novel under investigation, 2) in terms of the discursive strategies used in the novel under study, some are resorted to more than others, and 3) some ideologies and social power are more commonly revealed than others by way of certain discursive strategies. The novel is analyzed discursively within Fairclough's approach (2001).The most important conclusions, the study has come up are: 1) the discursive strategies employed in the novel under investigation are: presupposition, intertextuality and speech acts, 2) the most commonly discursive strategy by which ideologies are revealed in the novel is intertextuality.
Metrics
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Abbas, Wasan M. (2020)."Discursive Strategies in Western Political Discourse: Nationalism and Immigration", in Journal of Tikrit University for Humanities, Tikrit Uneversity, 27 (12) 21-1.
Bazerman, Charles, (2004). Intertextuality: How Texts Rely on Other Texts, in What Writing Does and How It Does It, Santa Barbara: Erlbaum University of California.
Billig, Michael (2002). "Critical Discourse Analysis and the Rhetoric of Critique", in Weiss and Wodak, (Ed.) Critical Discourse Analysis Theory and Interdisciplinarity, by New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
De Beaugrande, R and Dressler, W. (1981). Introduction to Text Linguistics. Essex and New York: Longman Group Limited.
Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and Power, London: Longman.
----------------- (1993) "Critical discourse analysis and the Commodification of Public Discourse", in Discourse and Society in Directions in Organization Studies, (Ed.) by Stewart R Clegg (2009), London: Sage.
----------------- (1995)."Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language", in (Eds) Watts R. and Heller M. Language in Social Life Series, London: Sage.
----------------- (2001). Language and Power, London: Longman.
----------------- (2003). Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research, Oxon and New York: Routledge
Foucault M. (1972). The Archaeology of Knowledge, London: Tavistock.
--------------- (1980). Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, London: Pantheon Books.
Kashkool, Hind S. and Hameed, Amenah F.(2020). "The Speech Acts Recognition of ESP Students with and without Body Language",Journal of Tikrit University for Humanities, Tikrit University, 27 (5) 19-1.
Meyer, Michael, (2001). Between Theory, Method and Politics: Positioning of the Approaches to CDA, in Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, (Ed.) by Wodak, R. and Meyer, M., London: Sage.
Sttocket, Kathreen, 2009, The Help, New York: Penguin Random House.
Thibault, Paul John, (1994). Text And/Or Context?: An Open Question, in (Ed.) Bouissac, Paul, The Semiotic Review of Books, Toronto: Toronto Press.
Touya, Aurore (2016). The Help by Kathryn Stockett (Book Analysis): Detailed Summary, Analysis and Reading Guide. BrightSummaries.com.
Van Dijk, T. (1995). Power and the News Media, in Political Communication and Action, D. Paletz (Ed.), Cresskill: Hampton Press.
--------------- (1998) Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach, London: Sage.
Yule, G. (1998). Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.