Ways of Thinking of Displaced and Non-displaced University Students ( A Comparative Study )
Main Article Content
Abstract
The situations witnessed by the Iraqis since the invasion of ISIS of some of the Iraqi cities and provinces and the accompanying military operations have forced many families to move from their areas of residence and search for safer and more stable areas.
The present study aims to identify the following:
1- Methods of thinking among displaced university students.
2- Methods of thinking among displaced university students by gender variable (Male - Female)
3- Methods of thinking among non-displaced university students.
4 - Identify the methods of thinking among the university students non-displaced by variable type (males - females)
To achieve the objectives of the research, the researcher had to adopt a means to achieve his goals. The researcher relied on the Gregoric scale 1988. The scale consists of (15) positions. Each position includes four paragraphs and each paragraph measures one of the following methods of thinking. The scale was applied to a sample of (539) students: (366) displaced students and (173) non-displaced students. The study reached to discover the prevailing thinking among the displaced students which is the method of random abstract thinking and consecutive abstract and lastly was the method of consecutive physical thinking was another in the method of consecutive material thinking is the style of the non-displaced students.
Metrics
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
abu khmrat, salim muhamad (2011) 'asalib altafkir ladaa ghrighurk waealaqatuha biaistiratijiat altaelum walaistidhkar ladaa tlbt aljamieat, risalat majstyr ghyr manshurihi, kiat altarbiati, jamieatan tkryt
alzubidiu, yuearib salih (2018) almushkilat alnafsiat waealaqataha bitaqdir aldhdhat ladaa altalabat aleayidin min alnuzuh fi almarhalat al'iiedadiati, risalat majstyr ghyr manshurat, kuliyat altarbiat lileulum al'iinsaniati, jamieatan tkryt
shabali, 'aminih 'iibrahim (2003) birwfilat 'asalib altafkir litulab altakhasusat alakadymyat min marhalat aljamieati, dirasat muqarant, almajalat almisriat lildirasat alnafsiati, almujalid (12) aleadad (34)
alsamidei, numir 'iibrahim (2013) aldhaka' alruwhiu waealaqatuh bi'asalib altafkir wabed simat alshakhsiati, 'utruhatan dukturah ghyr manshurat, kulat altarbiati, jamieatan tkryt
aleatuwm, eadnan yusif (2004) eilm alnafs almaerifii alnazariat waltatbiqi, dar almasirat lilnashri, eaman, al'urdun
qatami, yusif wakharun (2000) tasmim aldirs, dar alfikr, eaman, al'urdun
lajnat alsalib al'ahmar, 2007: 10)
nasarin, yahyaa wsfa' majid (2010) 'asalib altafkir ladaa tlbt altaelim almahnii waealaqatiha bialtahsil alakadymy liltalabat waitijahihim nahw takhasusihim fi al'urduni waealaqatiha bisamat alshakhsiati, almajalat altarbuiatu, aleadad 95 aljamieat alhashmyt, al'urduni
-Anita (1998) Regulation of Migration: International Experiences Spiniest
-Gregory ,A,F(1997) Learning & teaching style. Educational Leadership.
-Grigorenk,E,& Sternbreg,R(1997) style of thinking, abilities,& academic preference , Exceptional Children .
-Herrmann,D (1987) Psychology Action Intelligences & Intelligences testing ,New York .
-Sternbreg,RJ,1994 (1994) Allowing , for thinking styles Educational Leadership
- Wing Fat(,2010)Gender differences in learning Styles, university of Hong Gong