Main Article Content

Jawher Brk Muter
gawherbrak@tu.edu.iq

Abstract

The current study aims to propose a strategy based on Matthew Lipman's cognitive theory and explain its effectiveness on the achievement of fourth-stage EFL students in the subject of testing. The proposed strategy has been applied on a sample of 100 male and female students in the Department of English, distributed into two groups. The first experimental group is taught testing by using the proposed cognitive strategy, while the second control group is taught the same subject by using the conventional method. The obtained result indicates that experimental group students, who have been taught by using the proposed cognitive strategy based on Matthew Lipman's theory, outperformed the control group students, who have been taught by using the conventional method. Therefore, the alternative hypothesis is accepted, stating that there is a statistically significant difference between the average scores of the experimental and control groups achievement in testing, and in favour of the experimental group. The effectiveness of the proposed cognitive strategy is attributed to the engagement of the students' minds and the arbitration of knowledge to achieve a deeper understanding of the studied subject. The effective role of the mental trial for the experimental group in the cognitive, emotional, psychomotor aspects. The study stressed the need to employ learning theories in the field of teaching, especially cognitive theories.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

How to Cite
Muter, J. B. (2025). The Impact of a Proposed Strategy Based on Matthew Lipman’s Cognitive Theory in Teaching “Testing” on EFL University Students’ Performance . Journal of Tikrit University for Humanities, 32(3, 2), 77–102. https://doi.org/10.25130/jtuh.32.3.2.2025.05
Section
Articles

References

Anderson, Garry and Arsenault, Nancy (1998) A Fundamental of Educational Research. 2nd ed. USA. Routledge Falmer, Taylor& Francis Group.

- Anderson, J. R. (2015). Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications (8th ed.). W.H. Freeman.

- Baron, J. (2008). Thinking and Deciding (4th ed.). Cambridge University Press.

- Bryson, J. M. (2018). Strategic Planning for Public and Nonprofit Organizations: A Guide to Strengthening and Sustaining Organizational Achievement (5th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

- Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

- Cattell, R. B. (1971). Abilities: Their Structure, Growth, and Action. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

- Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

- Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, M. W. (1985). Personality and Individual Differences: A Natural Science Approach. New York: Plenum Press.

- Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative "description of personality": The Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(6), 1216–1229.

- Lipman, M. (1998) What Can Critical Thinking Be? In D. D. Van Vleet (Ed.), Philosophy in the Classroom (3rd ed., pp. 35-48). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

- Lipman, M. (2003) Thinking in Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

- McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. Jr. (2003) Personality in Adulthood: A Five-Factor Theory Perspective (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.

- Mercier, H. (2016). The argumentative theory: Predictions and empirical evidence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20 (9), 689-700.

- Mischel, W. (1968). Personality and Assessment. New York: Wile

- Nickerson, R. S. (2004). Thinking and Reasoning: The Psychology of Deduction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

- Nisbett, R. E. (2003). The Geography of Thought: How Asians and Westerners Think Differently... and Why. The Free Press.

- Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and Systems of Thought: Holistic vs. Analytic Cognition. Psychological Review, 108(2), 291-310.

- Pressley, M., & Harris, K. R. (2006). Cognitive Strategy Instruction: From Basic Research to Classroom Instruction. Handbook of Educational Psychology (2nd ed.), edited by P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne, 265-286. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

- Scriven, M. (1991). Evaluation Thesaurus (4th ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

- Siegler, R. S., & Alibali, M. W. (2005). Children's Thinking (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

- Slavin, R. E. (2018). Educational psychology: Theory and practice (12th ed.). Pearson.

- Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Thinking Styles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

- Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J. (2007). Evaluation Theory, Models, and Applications. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

- Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: An Overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64-70.