التوجهات الهدفية وعلاقتها بقوة الأنا لدى طلبة الدراسات العليا في جامعة تكريت
الشريط الجانبي للمقالة
محتوى المقالة الرئيسي
الملخص
يهدف البحث الحالي التعرف على درجة التوجهات الهدفية لدى طلبة الدراسات العليا في جامعة تكريت، فضلاً عن التعرف على درجة قوة الأنا لديهم ومن ثم التعرف على العلاقة بين التوجهات الهدفية ، وقوة الأنا لدى طلبة جامعة تكريت ، وقد اعتمد البحث الحالي على المنهج الوصفي الارتباطي، وقد شمل البحث الحالي على عينة شملت (200) طالب وطالبة تم اختيارهم عشوائياً ، وقد تم تبني مقياس التوجهات الهدفية الذي أعدَّه (طه، 2019) ومقياس قوة الأنا (حسن، 2013)، وقد اسفرت النتائج بوجود علاقة ارتباطية ما بين متغيري البحث ، وبناءً على هذه النتائج خرج الباحثان بمجموعة من التوصيات والمقترحات.
المقاييس
تفاصيل المقالة
هذا العمل مرخص بموجب Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
المراجع
• Al-Aasar, (1988) A program in developing achievement motivation, Studies in Psychology, Educational Research Center, Qatar University, (24), pp. (161-200).
• Alport, (1936), p. 76, Personality Growth, translated by Jaber Abdel Hamid Jaber, Cairo, Dar Al Nahda Al Arabiya.
• Abu Shama, (2012), p. 26, The power of the ego and its relationship to methods of coping with stressful life events among working and non-working women, Master’s thesis, University of Bahna, Faculty of Arts.
• Behnam, (2001), Bala, defensive mechanisms and their relationship to ego strength, Master’s thesis (unpublished), College of Arts, University of Baghdad.
• Al-Baili, Al-Emadi, and Al-Sammadi (1998), Educational Psychology and its Applications, 2nd edition, Al-Falah Publishing and Distribution Office.
• Khalifa, (2000), Motivation for Achievement, 2nd edition, Dar Al-Fikr for Publishing and Distribution, Amman.
• Al-Zaghloul, (2000), a study of anxiety and depression among students at Mu’tah University and the relationship between them, Al-Ulum Magazine
• Humanities and Social Sciences, College of Humanities at the UAE University, Issue (1 ) (128 -97)
• Al-Zaghloul, (2006), p. 116, patterns of goals among students at Mu’tah University and their relationship to the study strategies they use, Jordanian Journal of Educational Sciences, 2 (3), 115-127.
• Sugar and Saghir, (2007), p. 7, ego strength and its relationship to psychological stress among university students, Journal of the College of Education, Al-Mustansiriya University.
• Al-Shamimari, (1996), p. 25, The strength of the ego of some psychological and social variables among inmates of the Girls’ Welfare Institution in Makkah Al-Mukarramah, Master’s thesis, College of Education, Umm Al-Qura University.
• Al-Shuwaili, (2008), p. 81, Social withdrawal and its relationship to ego strength among university students, Master’s thesis (unpublished), College of Arts, University of Baghdad.
• Odeh, (2002), p. 66, The psychosocial climate and its relationship to emotional reassurance and ego strength among female students at the Islamic University of Gaza, unpublished master’s thesis, Islamic University - Gaza, College of Education.
• Muqbil, (2010), p. 24, Psychological adjustment and its relationship to ego strength and some variables among diabetic patients in the Gaza Strip, Master’s thesis, College of Education, Islamic University - Gaza.
• Musa, (1981), Educational Psychology, House of Culture, Cairo.
• Al-Nabhan, (2000), A study of anxiety and depression among students at Mu’tah University and the relationship between them, Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, College of Humanities at the UAE University, Issue (1) (128 -97)
• Al-Nuaimi, 2012, No, the power of the ego and its relationship to problem solving among university students, Master’s thesis (unpublished).
• Al-Nayal, (1994), p. 544, The source of control and its relationship to ego strength, neuroticism, and extroversion among a sample of male and female university students in the State of Qatar (a comparative scientific study), Yearbook of the College of Education, Qatar University.
• Al-Hindawi, (2000), A study of anxiety and depression among students at Mu’tah University and the relationship between them, Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, College of Humanities at the UAE University, Issue (1), (97-128).
• Ames, C.(1992). Classrooms:Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), pp 261-271.
• Ames, C., and Archer, J. (1987). Mothers beliefs about the role of ability and effort in school learning, Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 409-414.
• Dweck, C., & Leggett, E. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256-273.
• Dweck,C.S (1986). Motivation processes affecting learning. American Psychology, 41, pp 1040-1048.
• Elliot, and Charch, M. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 218-232.
• Fontana, 1995, p.388 , Psychology for teachers , 3ed. , Macmilan Press , LTD.
• Nicholls, J, Patashnick, M. & Nolen, S.(1985). Adolescents theories of education. Journal of Educational Psychology,77,683-692.
• Lock.E. A., and Latham, G. P.(1990). A theory of goal setting and task Performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-hall.
• Sehill , 1988, p . 324 , Relation between coping styleand Barron’s ego, strength seale , Psychological Reports (66).
• Seifert,T.L. (1995). Characteristics of ego- and task-oriented students: a comparison of two methodologies. British Journal of.
• Stanger , R. 1961 , Psychology of personality third edition , mcgraw , Hill book company , Inc . New york .