Main Article Content

Nawal Ahmed Mahmood Al-Mafraji
harith_abd2016@tu.edu.iq
Manal Omar Mousa
harith_abd2016@tu.edu.iq

Abstract

This study aims to:
Find out the effect of Mnemonic Strategy on university students' achievement in English reading comprehension, Find out whether there is any significant difference between students' achievement at the recognition level on one hand, and their achievement at the production level, on the other hand . Find out whether there is any significant difference between the achievement of male students and that of females in English reading comprehension.The sample of this study consists of ninety two EFL second-year students that represents 28.75 percent of its original population and divided into two equal groups.To fulfill the aims of this study an experiment has been designed . The two groups have been taught the same instructional material. The experimental group has been taught according to Mnemonic strategies , while the control group has been taught according to the traditional way. An achievement test has been constructed , validated ,and applied to the two involved groups. The required data has been collected and analyzed statistically .

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

How to Cite
Mahmood Al-Mafraji, N. A., & Mousa, M. O. (2019). The Effect of Mnemonic Strategy on EFL college Students’ Achievement in Reading Comprehension. Journal of Tikrit University for Humanities, 26(9), 33–58. https://doi.org/10.25130/jtuh.26.9.2019.26
Section
Articles

References

- Allam, S. (2000) The Educational Measurement and Evaluation. (1st ed.) Cairo: Dar Al-Fukhir Al Arabi.

- Amoli , F. Karbalaei, A(2012). The Effect of Mnemonic Strategies Instruction on the Immediate and Delayed Information Retrieval of Vocabulary Learning in EFL Learners. Islamic Azad University, Iran

- Bakken, J. Simpson, C(2011)Mnemonic strategies: Success for the Young-Adult Learner. The Journal of Human Resource and Adult Learning Vol. 7, Num. 2

- Best J. W. and Khan, J. N. (2006) Research in Education. (10th edition) Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc

- Brunvand, J .(1996)American Folklore. New York& London: Garland publishing, Inc

- Clark,J. Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review

- Collins.A.(1987) English Dictionary. London: London and Glasgow Inc.

- Evans, W(1989) Memory Training a complete and Practical System Developing and Confirming the Memory. New York: A.S. Barnes& co.

- Harmer, Jeremy (1983) The Practice of English Language Teaching. England : Longman Ltd.

- Harris, D. R. (1969) Teaching English as a Second Language. New York: MC Graw-Hill Book Com

- Higbee, K(1994)More motivational aspects of an imagery mnemonic. Applied Cognitive Psychology

- Horwitz, E(2008) Becoming a Language Teacher A practical Guide to Second Language Learning and Teaching. New York: Pearson Education Inc. pp 120-121

- Kilickaya , Ferit (2006) "Text-to- speech Technology : What Does it offer to Foreign Language Learners?" Middle East Technical University, vol.7,No.2 January (Kilikaya@metu.edu.tr

- Kraiger, K. Passmore, J. Rebelodos, N. Malvezzi, S(2015) Handbook of the Psychology of Training Development and Performance Improvement. India: John Wiley& sons Ltd. Language Skills. ELT Journal.

- Laing. G(2010). An empirical test of Mnemonic device to Improve Learning in Elementary accounting: Journal of education for Business

- Nicholas, J(1977) Images, Perception, and Knowledge. Holland: D. Riedel publishing Company, Dordrecht