Building a Mental Blueprint of Text Using the SVR Model (SVR)
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The current study aims at finding out the effect of using Simple View of Reading model in improving mental blueprint of text for EFL preparatory school Students, Finding out the differences between the mean scores of the first experimental group model in improving mental Blueprint of Text skills (A. Comprehension components B. integration of information C. mental Imagery and visualization D. inference making and engagement E. retention and recall) for EFL preparatory school Students, To verify the hypotheses and achieve the aims of the study, quasi- experimental design is adopted, namely the design of a "Non-Randomized Control Group Pretest- Posttest Design. The sample consists of 70 students from the fifth scientific stage Naji Al-Ajbara Preparatory School for Girls in Al- Alam city for, distributed into two groups, experimental and control with 35 students for each. Both groups. The experiment lasted for two months, during the academic year 2024-2025.
Metrics
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Baddeley, A. D. (2003). Working memory: Looking back and looking forward. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4(10), 829–839. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1201
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford University Press.
Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101(3), 371–395. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.101.3.371
Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7(1), 6–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193258600700104
Hoover, W. A., & Gough, P. B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 2(2), 127–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00401799
Ibrahim, Khalaf Salih. )2021). Difficulties Faced by EFL First Year University Students in Using Noun Derivational Affixes. Linguistics, Education. Journal of Tikrit University for the Humanities
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Harvard University Press.
Kendeou, P., & van den Broek, P. (2007). The effects of prior knowledge and text structure on comprehension processes during reading of scientific texts. Memory & Cognition, 35(7), 1567–1577. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193491
Kendeou, P., McMaster, K. L., & Christ, T. J. (2014). Reading comprehension: Core components and processes. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(1), 62–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732214544517
Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction–integration model. Psychological Review, 95(2), 163–182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.163
Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge University Press.
Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85(5), 363–394. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.85.5.363
McNamara, D. S. (2001). Reading both high-coherence and low-coherence texts: Effects of text sequence and prior knowledge. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55(1), 51–62. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0087352
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Snow, C. E. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. RAND Corporation.
Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123(2), 162–185. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.123.2.162