Main Article Content

Nuha Amir Kamel
nuha4369@gmail.com

Abstract

The propensity for students to put in less effort when working in a group than when working alone is known as social loafing. This phenomenon can happen in a variety of contexts, including educational situations like language learning areas. Social laziness may have a detrimental impact on the learning results of students in English language schools. When students are assigned language learning tasks in groups, some may depend on their peers to complete the work or give less than their reasonable share, resulting in a less-than-ideal result for the group as a whole. Lower grades, less motivation, and a decline in linguistic skills can be the results of this.


    Social loafing might not be visible when examining group performance as a whole. The only way to start seeing social loafing in environments like the workplace is to look at everyone's individual performance.


   In order to preserve objectivity when working in a group, students will merely slack off; this study investigates the occurrence of social loafing in group teams. Teachers can help students learn more, become more motivated, confident, and improve their collaboration skills by decreasing social loafing. To gather information, a questionnaire survey was conducted. 100 students from the English Department at the College of Education for Humanities/University of Diyala made up the sample for the academic year (2022).

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

How to Cite
Kamel, N. A. (2023). Conceptualization of Social Loafing Phenomenon among EFL Students. Journal of Tikrit University for Humanities, 30(6, 1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.25130/jtuh.30.6.1.2023.24
Section
Articles

References

Aggarwal, P. & O’Brien, C.L., 2008. Social Loafing on Group Projects: Structural Antecedents and Effect on Student Satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Education.

Al-Juboury, Nejat (2000). A Language Teachers' Guide to Assessment University of Baghdad, College of Education for Women.

Al- Samawi, Ahmed, M. (2000) An Introduction to Research Techniques in Linguistics and Literature. Sana'a : Sana'a University.

Arevalillo-Herráez, M. (2014). Impact evaluation of reactive assessment strategies to address social loafing by promoting student cooperation and encouraging mutual support. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 51(5), 523-532.

Beal, D.J. et al., 2003. Cohesion and performance in groups: a meta-analytic clarification of construct relations. The Journal of Applied Psychology.

Bergman (1981) Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Science. Bosten :Pearson Education.

Burdett, J., 2003. Making Groups Work: University Students’ Perceptions. International Education Journal, 4(3), pp.177–191.

Chidambaram, L., & Tung, L. L. (2005). Is out of sight, out of mind? An empirical study of social loafing in technology-supported groups. Information Systems Research.

Dommeyer, C.J., 2007. Using the Diary Method to Deal With Social Loafers on the Group Project: Its Effects on Peer Evaluations, Group Behavior, and Attitudes. Journal of Marketing Education, 29(2), pp.175–188.

Hansen, R.S., 2006. Benefits and Problems With Student Teams: Suggestions for Improving Team Projects. Journal of Education for Business, 82(1), pp.11–19.

Hardy, C., & Latane, B. (1986). Social loafing on a cheering task. Social Science, 77, 165-172.

Harkins, S. G., & Jackson, J. M. 1985. The role of evaluation in eliminating social loafing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11(4): 457– 465.

Harkins, S. G., & Szymanski, K. 1989. Social loafing and group evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56: 934 –941.

Harkins, S. (1979). Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,37, 823-832.

Heaton, J.B. (1975). Writing English language tests : a practical guide for teachers of English as a second or foreign language. Longman. England.

Hoffman, R (2020, June 22). Social loafing: definition, examples and theory. Simply Psychology. www.simplypsychology.org/social-loafing.html.

Ingram, E.(1977). Basic Concepts in Testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Jackson, J. M., & Williams, K. D. (1985). Social loafing on difficult tasks: Working collectively can improve performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(4), 937–942. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.49.4.937.

Jaikumar, S., & Mendonca, A. (2017). Groups and teams: a review of bad apple behavior. Team Performance Management, 23(5/6), 243-259.

Karau, S. J., & Williams, K. D. (1993). Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(4), 681-706.

Kravitz, D.A., & Martin, B. (1986). Ringelmann rediscovered: The original article. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 936-941.

Latané, B. (1981) The Psychology of Social Impact. American Psychologist, 36, 343-356. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.36.4.343

Latane, B., Williams, K., & Harkins, S. (1979). Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 822-832.

Lount, R. B., Jr., & Wilk, S. L. (2014). Working Harder or Hardly Working? Posting Performance Eliminates Social Loafing and Promotes Social Laboring in Workgroups. Management Science, 60(5), 1098-1106.

Luo, Z.& Marnburg, E. (2013). Justice perceptions and drives of hotel employee social loafing behavior. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 33, 456-464.

Meyer, B., Schermuly, C. C., & Kauffeld, S. (2016). That's not my place: The interacting effects of faultlines, subgroup size, and social competence on social loafing behaviour in work groups. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 25(1), 31.

Myers, S.A. and Claus, C.J. (2012) The Relationship between Students’ Motives to Communicate with Their Instructors and Classroom Environment.

Richards, J.C & Rodgers ,T.(1986). Approaches & Methods in Language Teaching .Cambridge: Cambridge University press.

Schippers, M. C. (2014). Social loafing tendencies and team performance: The compensating effect of agreeableness and conscientiousness. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 13(1), 62-81

Schnake, M. E. (1991). Equity in effort: The “sucker effect” in co-acting groups. Journal of Management, 17, 41-55.

Steiner, I.D. (1972). Group processes and group productivity. New York: Academic.

Williams, K. D., & Karau, S. J. (1991). Social loafing and social compensation: The effects of expectations of co-worker performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.