Main Article Content

Marwa Sami Hussein
marwa.sami@tu.edu.iq

Abstract

Describing Shakespeare as a feminist or misogynist is a debatable issue. While some feminist critics believe that Shakespeare's plays place women as equal to men, others suggest that they enhance the subordination of women. However, The Merchant of Venice enables one to argue that Shakespeare writes back 16th century women's emancipation through challenging women subalternity that confined them to nurturing and domestic sphere. This article tackles The Merchant of Venice from a feminist perspective aiming at highlighting feminist concepts that appeal to power dynamics and destereotyping. The purpose of this study is to illustrate the role of women in Elizabethan era as represented in The Merchant of Venice. As such, this article answers the question of literary representation which parallels in importance the thematic issues the play tackles. It, furthermore, follows a structural approach that comes across the different layers that constitute the contextual system of meaning in the play.   

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

How to Cite
Hussein, M. S. (2025). Challenging Masculine Power Dynamics and Patriarchal Stereotyping: A Feminist Reading of The Merchant of Venice. Journal of Tikrit University for Humanities, 32(3, 2), 288–307. https://doi.org/10.25130/jtuh.32.3.2.2025.15
Section
Articles

References

Auden, W. H. (1964). The merchant of Venice. In A. M. Eastman & G. B. Harrison (Eds.), Shakespeare's critics: From Jonson to Auden: A medley of judgements (pp. 260 – 261). The University of Michigan Press.

Cahn, V. L. (2001). The plays of Shakespeare: A thematic guide. Greenwood Press.

Chrysostom, S. J. (2011). The homilies of S. John Chrysostom on the epistles of st. Paul the apostle (Members of the English Church, Trans.). Baxter. http://classicchristianlibrary.com/library/chrysostom_john/Chrysostom-Tim-Tit.pdf

Dusinberre, J. (2003). Shakespeare and the nature of women. Palgrave.

French, M. (1981). Shakespeare's division of experience. Ballantine Books.

Goddard, H. C. (1951). The meaning of Shakespeare. The University of Chicago Press.

Greer, C. (2003). To be a woman: Shakespeare’s patriarchal viewpoint. The Corinthian, 5(1), 134-146. https://kb.gcsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1198&context=thecorinthian

Halio. J. L. (2000). Understanding the merchant of Vience: A student casebook to issues, source, and historical documents. Greenwood Press.

Kaplan, M. L. (2016). Others and lovers in the merchant of Venice. In Dympna Callaghan (Ed.), A feminist companion to Shakespeare (pp. 361-377). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Ludowyk, E. F. C. (1962). Understanding Shakespeare. Cambridge University Press.

Novy, M. (1981). Demythologizing Shakespeare. Women’s Studies, 9(1), 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/00497878.1981.9978552

Palmer, D. J. (1972). The merchant of Venice, or the importance of being earnest. In M. Bradbury & D. J. Palmer, (Eds.), Shakespearean comedy. Stradford-Upon-Avon Studies (p. 106). Arnold.

Shakespeare, W. (1985). Hamlet prince of Denmark (Ph. Edwards, Ed.). Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1603).

Shakespeare, W. (1976). Othello (G. Salgado, Ed.). Longman. (Original work published 1622).

Shakespeare, W. (1987). The merchant of Venice: The new Cambridge Shakespeare (M. M. Mahood, Ed.). Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1600).

Shakespeare, W. (1965). Twelfth night (H. Baker, Ed.). A Signet Classic. (Original work published 1623).

Woolf, V. (2001). A room in one’s own. Broodview Press.