Persuasive Speech Acts in Selected Short Surahs of the Glorious Quran
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study delves into illocutionary speech acts and their pragmatic functions in standard Arabic religious discourse. It aims to examine illocutionary speech acts specifically and their pragmatic functions in Surah Al-Balad and Surah At-teen, which are short Surahs of the Glorious Quran, from a persuasive perspective. The significance of this study is to show the role of speech acts and their pragmatic functions as persuasive strategies used in the Holy Quran to convince people. Data for this study have been selected on the basis that they involve different types of direct and indirect illocutionary speech acts and different pragmatic functions, in addition, they seem to have not been tackled before from the perspective of persuasion. Furthermore, exegetical books like Al Shirazi, Qutb and Al Tabatabaei have been consulted for the interpretation of the previously mentioned Surahs on which the analysis depends. In this study, a qualitative method has been used to analyze the data and only twenty three examples have been examined. The conclusions of this study are that different illocutionary speech acts like representatives, directives, commissives and expressive and different pragmatic functions such as asserting, censuring, ordering, threatening, promising and blaming were used in the said Surahs for persuasion. Moreover, indirect illocutionary speech acts and their pragmatic functions in both Surahs were heavily used and several of them were performed in the form of a rhetorical question for a persuasive purpose in which people are involved in communication and an effect is created on their minds and hearts to make them reform themselves. Direct illocutionary speech acts and their pragmatic functions were also persuasively used in both Surahs to assert truths and to make people accept them and behave accordingly.
Metrics
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Ajeel, I. (2016). Compliment-Blame Relation and Responses. Uruk Journal, 9(4),
-443. DOI: 10.18018/URUK/016-9/423-443
Alkhirbash, A.(2016). Speech Acts as Persuasive Devices in Selected Speeches of
Dr. Mahathir Mohammed. International Journal of English and Education, 5
(2), 81-103.
Al-Saaidi , S.K., Al-Shaibani, G.K. & Al-Husseini, H.A.M.(2013). Speech Acts of
Prohibition in English and Arabic: A Contrastive Study on Selected Biblical
and Quranic Verses. AWEJ, 4 (4), 95-111.
Al-Saidi, Ali.H.(2016). Socio-Pragmatic Failure in the English Translations
of the Euphemistic Culture-Bound Expressions in the Qur'an by Non-Muslim
Translators. (Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis), KL.UPM Press.
Al Shirazi, N. (2005). Alamthal fi Tafsirkitab Allah Almunzal [The Best
Exegesis of the Revealed Book]( Vol. 15). Qom: Imam Ali School.
Al Tabatabaei, M. (2008). Al Mizan fi TafsirAlQuran [ Al Mizan, the Exegesis of
the Quran]. Beirut: Ala'ala Foundation for publications.
Altikriti, S. (2016). Persuasive Speech Acts in Barack Obama’s Inaugural
Speeches (2009, 2013) and The Last State of the Union Address (2016).
International Journal of Linguistics, 8(2), 47-66.
Alwahidi, A.(1994). Alwajeez fi Tafsir Kitab Allah Alaziz [ A Brief Exegesis of the
Glorious Quran] Damascus: Dar Al Qalam.
Amin, N., Abdul Safa, H., Darwis, H. & Maknun, T.(2017). Pragmatics Analysis:
Arabic Directive Imperative Speech Acts Used in Alquran. International
Journal of Science and Research,6(1), 952-955. DOI: 10.21275/ART20164093
Austin, J.(1962). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford :Oxford: Oxford University
Press.
Crystal, D. (2003). A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics. London: Blackwell.
Fathollahi, I. & Kamely, I. (2012). Persuasion Process in Quran. International
Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences,3(S), 2657-2666.
Faysal, T. A. (2013). Rhetorical Questions in Glorious Quran and Their Realization
in English. Journal of AlFrahedis Arts 17, 570- 581.
Holíčková, Z. (2019). Persuasive Strategies in Religious Discourse: A Contrastive
Analysis of Scripted Sermons.(Unpublished Master's Thesis). Masaryk
University, Brno, Czech.
Jibreen, M & Al-Janabi, H. (2018). The Relationship between Persuasion and
Speech Act Theory. Journal of Al-qadisiya in Arts and Educational Sciences,
(3), 30-37.
Mey, J. (1993). Pragmatics: An Introduction. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Munir, M.(2019). An Analysis on Directive Speech Act in English Translation of Al
Qur'an Surah Luqman.(Published Undergraduate Thesis). IAIN Kediri, East
Java, Indonesia. Retrieved from http://etheses.iainkediri.ac.id/1133/
Najjar, I. & Abu-Alhaj, T. (2019). Tenor of Quranic Rhetorical Questions: with
Reference to Two English Translations. IJALEL, 8(2), 205-211.
Nurfithri, N. (2020). The Speech Acts in the Surah Al-Fatihah: A Pragmatic
Study. Jurnal Sastra - StudiIlmiah Sastra, 9(2), 38-44. Retrieved from
http://45.118.112.109/ojspasim/index.php/sastra/article/view/109
Qutb, S. (1992). Fi Dhilal AI-Qur 'an[ In the Shade of the Quran]. Beirut: Dar AI-
Shorooq.
Sami, S. (2015). The Differences between Threat and Promise Acts. International
Research Journal of Humanities & Social Science, 1(III), 46-53.
Searle John R. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Searle, J. (1979). Expression and Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Susri, G, Ansar, F. & Muhassin, M. (2020). Speech Acts in English Translation of
the Holy Qur'n Surah Al-Kahfi by Abdullah Yusuf Ali. English Education:
Jurnal Tadris Bahasa Inggris,13(1), 75-89.
Verschueren, J. (1999). Understanding Pragmatics . London: Arnold.
Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
https://www.islamicfinder.org/
https://www.islamicfinder.org/quran/surah-al-balad/?translation=english-saheeh-international