Main Article Content

Sarmad Majeed Mohammed
sarmadalaubaidy@yahoo.com

Abstract

The function of statues has been interpreted in various ways, either at an academic or artistic level. Because of the different functions and meanings that they reflect, they are still a matter of some debate in various fields. Hence, examining the depiction of national monuments, historical scripts, and statues, is a worthy way to understand their material and the moral value at their roots. However, throughout this study another aspect of statue‟s function has been suggested, that of National statues as an iconic of Iraqi cultural identity, from a semiotic theoretical perspective. The aim of this paper is to delineate the identity of national statues depending on the text and the context that they come with; the focus is to define the importance of national statues by reconstructing the cultural identity of their roots and to present national statues as a bridge that help to transfer Iraqi culture and history to others who are not native. Semiotic theory, which was developed by Charles Sanders Peirce, can be applied to this discussion.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

How to Cite
Mohammed, S. M. (2022). Iraqi Statues as Iconic of Iraqi Cultural Identity in Adnan al- Sayegh’s Selected Poems: A Semiotic Study. Journal of Tikrit University for Humanities, 29(2), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.25130/jtuh.29.2.2022.25
Section
Articles

References

-Al-Sayegh, Adnan.(2021). “His poetic experience.” Received by Sarmad Majeed.

-Balavi, Rasool., et al.(2015). The Aesthetics of Imaginery in the Poetry of Adnan Sayegh. Iran: Arabic language and literature studies journal. Vol. 21, no. ,pp. 27-48.

-Bellentani, Fedrico and Panico, Mario.(2016). The Meanings of Monuments and Memorials: Toward a Semiotic Approach. Creative Commons, vol. 2, no.1,pp.28-46.

-Caves, Roger W.(2005). Encyclopedia of the City. Oxon: Routledge.

-Eco, Umberto.(1992). Interpretation and Overinterpretation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

-Eco, Umberto.(1979) The Role of the Reader. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

-Getsy, David J. (2014). Acts of Stillness: Statues, Performativity, and Passive Resistance. Wayne State University Press, Vol.56, no.1,pp.1-20.

-Hashem, Hashem Mohammad and Jalaei, Maryam.(2015). The Role of Repetitation in War Imagenry of Arabic and Persian Poetry in the Final Quarter of the Twentieth Century. Language and literature studies Journal. Vol,20,pp. 98-120

-Hay, Lain., et al.(2004). Monments, Memory and Marginalisation in Adelaide’s Prince Henry Gardens. Geografiska Annaler, pp.201-216.

-Hussein, Hassan Kadhim.(2015). The Reference Units of Adnan al-Sayegh in his Divan: Walk as Prisoner in my Surprise as if I Fly by Wings of Feathers Poem: Analytical Alternative Study. Dawat Journal, Vol.17,pp. 90-101.

-Lefebvre, Henri.(1974). The Production of Space. Trans. Donald Nicholson-Smith, Oxford: Black-well Publishers.

-Lewis, S.(1982). The Poetic Image. Translated by Ahmed Nassif and others. Baghdad:Dar Al-Rashid.

-Mertz, Elizabeth Ellen.(2013). Semiotics. University of Wisconsin: Madison.

-Riegl, Alois.(1903). Der Modern Denkmalkultus, seine wesen und seine entstehung. Wien&Leipzig: W.Braumuller.

-Shakir,Hareth Yaseen and Sayel, Arif Abd.(2020). Levels of Artistic Performance in Adnan Als’agh’sPoetry Semantic Space for Poetic Image as Pattern. University of Anbar: Journal of Art: Humanities and social studies. Vol.47.

-Yanow, Dvora.(2000). Conducting Interpretative Policy analysis. Thousand Oaks & California: Saga Publication.