Administrative Bullying among the Heads of Scientific Departments
Main Article Content
Abstract
The problem of job bullying among heads of departments is a serious one, as it is characterized by being one of the problems that are difficult to identify and evaluate accurately, and this requires the relevant authorities to find out the causes of job bullying in the workplace and its relationship to the performance of faculty members. Job bullying is a negative phenomenon that disturbs faculty members in universities because of the tendency of those in authority to follow a set of aggressive practices and methods in the work environment, which negatively affects the performance of faculty members. Occupational bullying is frequent among subordinates with emotional, authoritarian personal styles, who force their employees to exercise immediate compliance with orders, but they are not interested in explaining the reasons behind this, and in the event that their employees do not carry out their orders without questions, they resort to the exercise of threats instead of delegating powers. Tight control over any situation and control over them with great care Therefore, this research came to achieve the following two goals:
1-Administrative bullying among the heads of scientific departments.
2-The significance of the differences in administrative bullying among the heads of scientific departments according to the two variables:
A-Gender: (males – females).
B - Specialization: (scientific – human).
In order to reach the objectives of the research, the researcher built a scale of administrative bullying among the heads of scientific departments on a sample of (300) male and female teachers of Al-Mustansiriya University professors, and after extracting the validity and reliability coefficients of the scale, as well as extracting the data for their answers, the results of the research showed the following:
1-The heads of scientific departments suffer from a high level of administrative bullying.
2- There is no effect of gender and specialization in the high level of administrative bullying among the heads of scientific departments.
Metrics
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Allen، M.J.& Yen, W.M (1979): " Introduction to Measurement Theory " California, Brooks Cole.
Allport, G. W. (1937): Personality: A psychological interpretation, New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
Anastasi, A. (1976): psychological Testing. New York, 4th Ed, Macmillan Company.
Anttila , Henrika , et al , 2017 : From anxiety to enthusiasm: emotional patterns among student teachers, Pages 447-464 European Journal of Teacher Education Volume 40, 2017 - Issue 4. Raheef. A. H. " In vestment of Education Acasstualy of factors Affecting the Efficiency of educational activities in the higher education in Iraq " , thesis submitted to the University of Wales in Candida tura for the degree of ph D. 1986.
Appelbaum, S.H., et al (2005): ‘‘The relationship of ethical climate to deviant workplace behavior’’, Corporate Governance, Vol. 5 No. 4, pp. 43-56.
Appelbaum, S.H., et al (2005): ‘‘The relationship of ethical climate to deviant workplace behavior’’, Corporate Governance, Vol. 5 No. 4, pp. 43-56.
Barnard C.I. (2001): The Functions of the Executive; Cambridge, MA Harvard University Press.
Blake, R., & Mouton, J. (1964). The Managerial Grid: The Key to Leadership Excellence. Houston, TX: Gulf Publishing Company.
Bukor, E., (2011): Exploring Teacher Identity: Teachers’ Transformative Experiences of Re-Constructing and Re-Connecting Personal and Professional Selves, a thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Curriculum, Teaching and Learning Ontario Institute for Studies in Education University of Toronto.
Caspi, Avshalom & Roberts, Brent. W (2001): Personality Development Across the Life Course: The Argument for Change and Continuity, Psychological Inquiry, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, 12(2):49-66.
المصادر الأجنبية:
• Anastasi, A. (1976): psychological Testing. New York, fourth Ed, Macmillan Company.
• Bergman J. (1974). Understanding Educational Measurement and Evaluation; NJ London.
• Bukor, E., (2011): Exploring Teacher Identity: Teachers’ Transformative Experiences of Re-Constructing and Re-Connecting Personal and Professional Selves, a thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Curriculum, Teaching and Learning Ontario Institute for Studies in Education University of Toronto.
• Cowie, Helen, Naylor, Paul, Rivers, Ian, Smith, Peter K and Pereira, Beatriz. "Measuring workplace bullying, aggression and violent behavior", 2002, 7, 33-51.
• GLASL, F. (1982) 'The process of conflict escalation and roles of third parties,' in G. B. J. Bomers and R. B. Peterson, (eds) Conflict management and industrial relations, (pp. 119-140) The Hague: Kluwer Nijhoff Publishing.
• Kroll, A., (1960) validity as Affecter in test validity, Journal of Educational psychology. vol .31, No. 2. Pp.425-436.
• Nunnaly, J. C. (1978): Psychometric Theory, 2ed, New York, McGraw, Hill.
• Yahaya, Azizi, Chuiing, "The impact of workplace bullying on work performance", archives des sciences, 2012, 65(4).
• Yamada, David. "Workplace bullying and ethical leadership", the journal of values-based leadership, 2008, 1(2). p. (1-13).