The Input Cognitive Strategies in Teaching Short Story
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Input cognitive strategies are necessary for teaching literature in general and short story in particular as they are the used in the process of teaching to facilitate the understanding of the literary text. When teachers have the ability to use varied input cognitive strategies in teaching, their students will be able to treat the literary text easily and as a result their learning of literature in general and short story in particular will be enhanced. The present study aims at investigating the kinds of the input cognitive strategies used by teachers in teaching short story. The researcher uses the questionnaire to collect information about the use of input cognitive strategies; the sample of the study is the academic teachers at the English Department/ College of Education/ Tikrit Universities for the academic year 2021-2022.
Metrics
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Abrams, M.H. (2005). A glossary of literary terms. Singapore: Thomson Learning.
Anderson, T. D. & Garrison, R. D. (1998). Learning in a networked world: New roles and responsibilities. In C. C. Gibson (Ed.), Distance Learners in Higher Education. Madison, Wisconsin: Atwood Publishing.
Bachman, Lyle F and Palmer (1996). Language Testing in Practice: Designing and Developing Useful Language Tests. Oxford University Press.
Brown, D. H. (2015). Teaching by Principles: an Interactive approach to Language Pedagogy. New York: Longman.
Brown, Douglas (2001). Teaching by principles :an interactive approach to language pedagogy. NY: Longman.
Ebel, Robert L. (1972). Essentials of Educational Measurement. Englewood
Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Ehrman, M. E. and Oxford, R. L. (1995). Cognition Plus: correlates of language learning success. Modern Language Journal. Vol. 79. No. 1.
Griffiths, C. (2008). Language teaching Library: Lessons from good language learners, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Harris, D. P. (1969). Testing Language as a Second Language. New York:
McGraw- Hill Book Company.
Johnson, Paula D. (1998). Experimental Design. USA: University of Arizona. http://www.utrc.edu
Joshi, G. D. (2011). Effectiveness of using technology in Teaching Short Stories.
An Unpublished M. Ed. thesis, T.U.
Lado, Robert. (1975). Language Testing. Wing Tasi Cheung Printing Company.
Lazar, G. (1993). Literature and language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mahilda, A. T. (2018). Cognitive Strategy Training in Improving Students’ Reading Comprehension.
Muhammad Rusni, I. S. (2017). The Cognitive Strategies through the Reading Comprehension in Islamic Education.
O’Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1987). The cognitive academic language learning approach: A bridge to the mainstream. TESOL Quarterly. Vol. 21. No. 2.
Pilliner ,A . (1968). Subjective and Objective Testing in Davis Allens , Language Testing Symposium of Psycholin - guistics Approach. London: O.U.P.
Revers, W. M. (1968). Teaching foreign language skills. Chicago: University of Chicago.
Richards, J., and Schmidt, R., (2010). Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics. Pearson Education Ltd.
Richards, Jack and Theodore Rodgers. (1986). Approaches and Methods in
Language Teaching: A Descriptive Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rizqiani, A. (2008). Strategies for Reading Short Stories, Published M.A thesis, Santa Dharma University.
Underhill, G. L. (1987) . A Graded Listening Comprehension Programme. English Teaching Forum ,Vol. XIX, No.4.
Yusuf, R. (2018). the effect of using Cognitive Strategy Instruction in Writing (CSIW) to teach Writing for eight grade at Islamic Junior HighSchool Alkhairiyah Kota Jambi. Published M.A. thesis, State Islamic University/ Sulthan Thaha Syaifuddin Jambi.