An Investigation of EFL Students' Perception of Integration Between Morphology and Pronunciation in The English Language
Main Article Content
Abstract
The study aims to investigate the students' perception the integration between morphology and pronunciation in the English language. The problem of the study is that English language students study the change of pronunciation additions according to the laws of sound at the secondary stage, but at the university stage, despite their study of phonetics and phonology, the degree of their awareness of the overlap between morphology and phoneme is unknown. The study sample consists of (150) samples, including (90) males and (60) females. The results of the study shows that the students got a medium mark of perception the integration between morphology and pronunciation in the English language. According to the findings and results of the study it has been noticed that the ability of male and female students in morphological and phonological levels, are not equal. where the performance of the male students is better than the females in the diagnostic test. In this case the hypothesis which states that there is significant difference between the male and female students' level is accepted.
Also, the results of the questionnaire show that the students' perception of integration is not good, as they do not realize the relationship between the two, and even they seem unaware of the teaching relationship at this stage, which increases the students' ability to interact, and the students are not aware of the vocabulary of the paragraphs mentioned in the questionnaire.
Metrics
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Aronoff, M. and Fudeman, K. (2011). What is Morphology? (2nd edition). West Sussex: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Comrie, B. (1985). Tense. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
ELTAIF, Sua'ad. PHONOLOGICAL ASPECTS IN ENGLISH AND ARABIC. Journal of Tikrit university for humanities - مجلة جامعة تكريت للعلوم الانسانية, [S.l.], v. 26, n. 3, p. 1-16, June 2019.
Falk, J.S., (1978). Linguistics and Language. John Wiley and Sons, Inc.: Canada.
Gor, Kira. (2015). Phonology and Morphology in Lexical Processing. Cambridge University Press.
KAWTHER, Parween. English Language Learners’ Attitudes toward the Effectiveness of Communicative Strategies to Develop Their Speaking Skill. Journal of Tikrit university for humanities - مجلة جامعة تكريت للعلوم الانسانية, [S.l.], v. 27, n. 1, p. 19-1, Jan. 2020.
Kiparsky, P. (1982). From Cyclic Phonology to Lexical Phonology. In H. van der Hulst and N. Smith (Eds.), The structure of phonological representations (pp. 131–176). Dordrecht: Foris.
Kuperman, V.,; Pluymaekers, M.,; Ernestus, M., and Baayen, R. H. (2007). Morphological Predictability and Acoustic Salience of Interfixes in Dutch Compounds. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 121, pp.2261–2271.
Lee-Kim, S.-I.,; Davidson, L., and Hwang, S. (2013). Morphological Effects on The Darkness of English Intervocalic /l/. Laboratory Phonology, 4(2), 475–511.
Levelt, W. J. M.,; Roelofs, A., and Meyer, A. S. (1999). A Theory of Lexical Access in Speech Production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, pp.1–38
Smith, R.,; Baker, R., and Hawkins, S. (2012). Phonetic Detail that Distinguishes Prefixed from Pseudo Prefixed Words. Journal of Phonetics, 40(5), pp.689–70
Yule, G. (2010). The Study of Language (4th edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.