Main Article Content

Amra Ibrahim Sultan
harith_abd2016@tu.edu.iq
Karwan Othman Aziz
harith_abd2016@tu.edu.iq

Abstract

This research aims to find out the following:



  1. Whether there is any significant difference between the achievement of the students of the experimental and control groups in the post-test.   

  2. Whether there is any significant difference between the achievement of the students of the experimental group in pre-test and post-test.

  3. Whether there is any significant difference between the achievement of the students of the control group in pre-test and post-test.


   These aims have been achieved through verifying the following hypotheses:



  1. There is a significant different between the mean scores of experimental and control concerning post-test.


 



  1. There is a significant difference between the mean scores of experimental group in the pre-test and post-test.


 



  1. There is not any  significant difference between the mean scores of the control group in pre-test and post-test.


 


A pre-test and post-test of written and oral questions have been constructed, validated, its reliability is obtained, and its items are analyzed and then applied to the two groups of study. The collected data has been statistically analyzed and the obtained results are as follows:    



  1. There is a significant difference between the mean scores of the experimental and control group in the post-test, and for the favor of the experimental. This means that the strategy of Multimedia Presentations has a positive role on university students’ achievement in speaking.

  2.   There is a significant difference between the mean scores of the students' achievement in pretest and post-test of experimental group.                                        

  3. There is no statistically significant difference between   the mean scores of the students' achievement in pre-test and post-test of the control group.


As a result, this study approved the effectiveness of Multimedia Presentation Strategy on improving students’ speaking skill

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

How to Cite
Sultan , A. I., & Aziz, K. O. (2021). The Role of Multimedia Presentation Strategy in Teaching Speaking to EFL University Students. Journal of Tikrit University for Humanities, 28(5), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.25130/jtuh.28.5.2021.24
Section
Articles

References

- Best J. W. and Khan, J. N. (2006) Research in Education. (10th Ed.).Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.

- Brown, H. (2007). Teaching By Principles. New York. Pearson Education Limited.

- Chaney, A.L., and T.L. Burk. (1998). Teaching Oral Communication in Grades. K-8. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

- Engleberg, I. & Daly, J. (2009). Presentation in Everyday Life. Boston. Pearson Education.

- Fauzi, Imam. (2016)” The Application of Multimedia- Based Presentation in Improving Students’ speaking Skill”. Journal of ELT Research, Vol 1, No6; pp103-111.

- Ferguson, George A. (1981) Statistical Analysis in Psychology and Education, 5th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co.

- Grzeszczyk, K.B. (2016) “Using Multimedia in English Classroom”. World scientific News, Vol 3, No 43; pp 104-157.

- Herrell, A. L. & Jordan, M. (2012). 50 Strategies for Teaching English Language Learners. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.

- Kothari, C. R. (2004) Research Methodology. New Delhi: New Age International limited.

- Oxford Advance Learner's Dictionary. (1995). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

- Richards, J. (2015). Key Issues in Language Teaching. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.

- Ur, P. (2012). Course in English Language Teaching. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.

- -Webster, M. (2005) Webster Collegiate Dictionary. USA: Merriam Company.

Most read articles by the same author(s)