The Evaluation of Final Exam Questions for scientific and Humanities Departments according to Blooms Cognitive Classification in the College of Basic Education, Salahuddin University – Erbil
Main Article Content
Abstract
The study aims to analyze and evaluate the questions of the final exams of the departments of Faculty of Basic Education / Salahuddin University - Erbil, the limitation of the study represents the final exam questions for the academic year (2016-2017). The researcher has used the descriptive method in both the survey and the analytical. The population of the study are all the final theoretical examination questions that were set by the teachers at this faculty for the end of the academic year (2016-2017) / first setting. Then the researcher randomly selected (15) test question papers for each of the scientific and literal departments which are (6) departments and they are distributed among stages (1-4) thus it becomes (90) exams (tests) and their percentage of (51.72%) which is represented by the sample of the study. In order to investigate the aims of the study, the researcher has designed a special form to be used as a criterion for the analysis of the exam questions, which were formed from all the levels of the cognitive field according to Bloom's pyramid, for each group contents are described, to verify the validity of the tool, it was presented to a group of experts and specialists in the field of curriculum and teaching methods as jury members, and after analyzing the views of the experts, the researcher extracted the relative rates of each element ranging from (89% -90%) of levels of cognitive goals. In order to find out the reliability of the study, the researcher took a random sample of 15% of the questions paper to be analyzed according to the cognitive level twice and with a different periods of time, about (4) weeks to find the researcher's reliability work during this time. Then, the researcher asked other analysts to analyze it according to the specific criterion of analysis, after that the researcher created and find out the proportion of agreement between her work with the other analysts’ by using Scott’s equation, methods and data analyzing. The most important findings of the search results is that, the final exams in the College of Basic Education at the University of Salahuddin for the academic year in the first setting focused mostly on the levels of the first three levels of Bloom's cognitive knowledge of memory, understanding and application, and we find that a small percentage of final exam questions focused on Level of analysis, synthesis and evaluation.
Metrics
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Abu Jarad, Hamdi Younes (2011). The extent of teachers' commitment to analyzing the results of achievement tests and its relationship to their attitudes towards them, Journal of Al-Azhar University in Gaza, Human Sciences Series, Volume 13, Issue 22
Abu Daqqa, Sana Ibrahim (2007) Classroom Measurement and Evaluation, Concepts and Procedures for Verb Learning, Gaza, Afaq Library.
Ashbab and Sawsan Farid (2003). The extent of the efficiency of home economics teachers in constructing achievement tests in the schools of the Ministry of Education in Jordan according to the criteria for a good test, an unpublished master's thesis, Amman Arab University for Postgraduate Studies - Jordan.
Al-Imam, Mustafa and others (1990). Calendar and Measurement (1st edition), College of Education - Baghdad, Dar Al-Hikma for printing and publishing.
Al-Baghdadi, Muhammad Reda (1988). Objectives and Tests in Theory, Application and Teaching Methods, Al-Falah Library, Kuwait.
Al-Thawabiya, Ahmed and others (2004). Evaluation strategies and tools, theoretical framework under Canadian supervision of the ERFKEE Knowledge-Based Economy Project.
Al-Khattabiah, Abdullah (1970). The use of questions in the classroom, Dar Al-Masira.
Al-Khatib, Ahmed and others (1986). A guide to research and educational evaluation, Dar Al-Mustaqbal for Publishing and Distribution (Amman-Jordan).
Al-Zaher, Zakaria Muhammad and others (1999). Principles of Measurement and Evaluation in Education, Dar Al Thaqafa for Publishing and Distribution, (Amman - Jordan).
Al-Mashraqi, Ibrahim (1980). Objective tests and essay tests, Rasalah Magazine, Issue 1, (Amman-Jordan).
Al-Najjar, Nabil Jumaa (2010). Measurement and Evaluation: An Applied Perspective with SPSS Programming Applications, Amman, Dar Al-Hamid for Publishing and Distribution.
Barakat, Ziyad and Sabah Abd al-Hadi (2007). The extent to which the final exam questions at Al-Quds University presented educational goals according to Haram Bloom, Al-Quds Open University for Research and Studies, Issue (9).
Hamdan, Hamad Zia (1980). Student Evaluation, Its Foundations and Applications, first edition, Dar Al-Alam for Millions, Beirut.
Damaa, Majid Ibrahim and Muhammad Musa (1982). The textbook and its suitability for the processes of learning and teaching in the primary stage, Arab Organization for Education, Culture and Science, Educational Research Unit (Tunisia)
Saif, Muhammad Hatem (2008). The level of knowledge of male and female educational supervisors about the principles of achievement tests in Taiz Governorate, an unpublished master's thesis, College of Education, Yarmouk University - Jordan.
Shaheen, Muhammad (1999). Evaluation of final exam questions at Al-Quds Open University, a study presented for the Scientific Day on the philosophy and methods of open education, Al-Quds Open University.
Allam, Salah El-Din Mahmoud (2009). Educational Measurement and Evaluation in the Teaching Process, College of Education, Al-Azhar University, Dar Al-Masira for Publishing and Distribution (Jordan-Amman).
Alawneh, Rana Muhammad (2005). Building a measure of teachers' attitudes towards school tests according to Thurston's method, an unpublished master's thesis, Yarmouk University, Jordan.
Odeh, Ikhlas Hashim (2021): Evaluating the objectives of art education for the intermediate stage, Tikrit University Journal for Human Sciences, Volume (28), Number (12), pp. 530-546.
Odeh, Ahmed (2002). Measurement and Evaluation in the Teaching Process, 3rd edition, Yarmouk University, Irbid, Jordan.
Essawy, Abd al-Rahman Muhammad (1975). The problem of evaluation in university education, its basis and methods of treatment, Journal of the Federation of Arab Universities, Issue (5).
_____________ (1985). Measurement and Experimentation in Psychology and Education, Alexandria, University Knowledge House.
Murad, Salah Ahmed, and Suleiman Amin Ali (2000). Tests and measures in the psychological and educational sciences, preparation steps and their characteristics, Cairo, Dar Al-Kitab Al-Hadith.
Musa, Intisar Odeh (2021): Evaluation of the program for preparing new Arabic language teachers from the point of view of the trainees, Tikrit University Journal for Human Sciences, Volume (28), Issue (7), pp. 415-437.Carnen K&,W.
Carpenter(2003).Learning strategies ,New Academic Press.
Cooper Solo,O,Charles E.Merril (1974).Measurement and Analysis of Behavioral Techinques,Abell & Howell co.
Gay (1985).Education Evaluation and Measurement 2nd Ed. Mattel Publishing Company.
Gronland ,E (2000).Msurement and Evaluation In Teaching, 7thEd .McMillan.
Hopkins,C& Antens,R (1985). Classrom Measurement & Evaluation,2nd Ed ,pesaock Publisbers Incillonis.
jongmans H, & Bijaard , D, (2003).Teachers involve in school policy – making and the effect vines of School in-service training Teacher Development,6(1).
Scott,Willam & Michael Wertheimer (1968).Introduction to Psychological Research, New York, John Wiley.