A Critical Discourse Analysis of George W. Bush's Speeches on American Exceptionalism to Propagate War on Terrorism
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
American exceptionalism is a political philosophy with ideological rivals which lets the American people think of political conditions, such as equality, liberty, and democracy as possessions for the USA. It is based on American ideology. The study examines and analyzes the American ex-president George W. Bush's speeches by relating his language to the ideology in the speeches. The aim of the research is to reveal the effects of linguistic manipulations on ideology by linking language to the structure of a society, and to find out the impact of a combination of different ideologies on the audience. It also reveals how language is used positively and negatively to emphasize positive self-representation and negative other-representation. Therefore, it hypothesizes the question: Are Bush's rhetoric positively or negatively perceived by his community members particularly post the September 11th events? The data selected for this study are seven speeches of Bush from the period of September 2001 till January 2002 that are analyzed linguistically and ideologically within Van Dijk's (2005) framework. The study arrives at these conclusions: (i) Bush's rhetoric have emphasized the positive ideologies of the Americans by repeating the positive linguistic expressions, and the negative ideologies of their opponents (the terrorists) by repeating the negative linguistic expressions. (ii) The positive self-representation is explicitly used more than negative other-representation throughout the choice of vocabulary in the speeches.
Metrics
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Angermuller, J., Dominique, M. & Wodak, R. (2014). The Discourse Studies Reader. Benjamin publishing co.
Blommaert, J. & Bulcaen, C. (2000). Critical Discourse Analysis. Annual review of Anthropology, 29, 447-466.
Beard, A. (2000). The language of Politics. London: Routledge. Chouliaraki, L. & Fairclough, N. (1999). Discourse in Late Modernity: Rethinking Critical Discourse Analysis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University press.
De Filologia, Q. (2006). What is Critical Discourse Analysis. Estudis Linguistics. Vol. XI, pp. 9-34.
Fairclough, N. (1989): Language and Power. Longman Inc., USA. Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Polity press, London.
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London: Longman.
Fairclough, N. (2001). Language and Power (2nd ed). Routledge Publication, London.
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analyzing Discourse and Text: Textual Analysis For Social Research. Routledge publication, London. Fairclough, N. (2010): Critical Discourse Analysis. Longman publishing Group, USA.
Fairclough, N. & Wodak, R. (1997). Critical Discourse Analysis, in Van Dijk (ed). Discourse as Social Interaction. London. Sage publication
Gee, J. P. & Michael H. (2012). The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Routledge publication, USA.
Goodson, P. (2010). Theory in Health Promotion Research & Practice: Thinking outside the Box. Jones & Bartley Publishers.
Hart, C. (2010). Critical Discourse Analysis and Cognitive Science. Palgrave, UK.
Hodge, B. (2012). Ideology, Identity, Interaction: Contradiction and Challenges for Critical Discourse Analysis. Sydney: University of Western Sydney.
Ignatief, M. (2005): American Exceptionalism and Human Rights.Princeton University press, New jersey.
Jorgenson, M. & Philip L. J. (2002). Discourse Analysis as TheoryAnd Method. London: Sage publication.
McEnvoy-Levy, S. (2001). American Exceptionalism and US Foreign
Policy. Palgrave, Hamshire, USA.
Mills, A. (2003). Michel Foucoult. Rotledge, London.
Ramrattan, L. & Michael S. (2019). American Exceptionalism, Economic, Finance, Political Economy, and Economic Laws. Library of Congress, USA.
Sachs, J. D. (2018). A New Foreign Policy beyond American
Exceptionalism. Columbia University press, USA.
Savignon, S. J. (2006). Gender and Power in Applied Linguistics. An Epistemological Challenge. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 16 (1), 88-92.
Titischer, S., Meyer, M., Wodak, R. & Vetter, E. (2000). Methods of Text
And Discourse Analysis. Sage Publications, London.
Van Dijk, T. A. (1988): News as Discourse. Lawrence Exlbaum
Associates, Inc., New Jersey, USA.
Van Dijk, T. A. (1993). Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis.
Discourse and Society, 4 (2), 249-283.
Van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology, A Multidisciplinary Approach. Sage
Publication, Great Britain.
Van Dijk, A. T. (2005). Politics, ideology and discourse. In Ruth
Wodak (ed), Elsevier Encyclopedia of Language, 728-740. Van
Dijk, T. A. (2008). Discourse and Power. London, Palgrave
Macmillan.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2009): Society and Discourse. Published by Cambridge
Univ. Press, USA.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2014). Discourse and Knowledge: Socio-cognitive
Approach. Cambridge University press, UK.
Van Dijk, T., A. (2015). Critical Discourse Analysis. In D. Tannen, H.
Hamilton D. Schifrin, The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. (466-485) Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse and Practice: New Tools for
Critical Discourse Analysis. Oxford University press, New York.
Weiss, G. & Wodak, R. (2003). Critical Discourse Analysis. Palgrave, Hampshire, NY.
Wodak, R. (2001). What CDA is about? In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (2001).
Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. Sage publication Ltd. London.
Wodak, R. & Meyer, M. (2001). Methods of Critical Discourse
Analysis. Sage publication Ltd. London.
Yule. G. (1996). Pragmatics. London: Oxford University press.