A Functional Analysis of the Persuasive Strategies Used by Trump and Clinton in the United States 2016 Presidential Debates
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study presents a functional analysis of the persuasive strategies utilized by Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton in the three U.S. 2016 presidential debates (henceforth PDs). These PDs, which take place every four years, are the furthermost critical political rhetoric that gives rise to the voting of the following President. Such PDs cover an argument of various subjects between the candidates. Many scholars have studied the U.S. PDs, but there has not been a study that focuses primarily on the persuasive strategies (i.e. acclaim, attack, and defense) as a functional analysis in these debates. The persuasive strategies used by Trump and Clinton were excerpted from the U.S. 2016 PDs and analyzed using Benoit’s (2007) functional theory. The findings of analyzing the two presidential candidates' speeches in the U.S. 2016 PDs state that 53.1% of the persuasive strategies were utilized by Trump in opposite to 46.9% were utilized by Clinton.
Metrics
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Benoit, W. L. (2007). Communication in political campaigns (Vol. 11). Peter Lang.
Benoit, W. L. (2017). A Functional Analysis of 2016 Direct Mail Advertising in Ohio. American Behavioral Scientist, 0002764217693274.
Benoit, W. L., and Airne, D. (2005). A functional analysis of American vice presidential debates. Argumentation and Advocacy, 41, 225.
Benoit, W. L., McHale, J. P., Hansen, G. J., Pier, P. M., & McGuire J. P. (2003b). Campaign 2000: A functional analysis of presidential campaign discourse. Rowman & Littlefield.
Blendon, R. J., Benson, J. M., & Casey, L. S. (2016). Health care in the 2016 election—a view through voters’ polarized lenses. New England Journal of Medicine, 375(17), e37.
Clarke, M., & Ricketts, A. (2016). Understanding the Return of the Jacksonian Tradition. Orbis.
Enli, G. (2017). Twitter as arena for the authentic outsider: exploring the social media campaigns of Trump and Clinton in the 2016 US presidential election. European Journal of Communication, 32(1), 50-61.
Glantz, M., Benoit, W. L., & Airne, D. (2013). A functional analysis of 2012 US presidential primary debates. Argumentation and Advocacy, 49, 275.
Huang, C. H. (2017). Disillusionment and Disaggregation: Why Did Asian Americans Vote for Trump?
Powers, E. M., Moeller, S. D., & Yuan, Y. (2016). Political Engagement During a Presidential Election Year: A Case Study of Media Literacy Students. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 8(1), 1-14.
The New York Times: Transcript of the first debate, September 27, 2016a. Retrieved on March 12, 2017 from https://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/27/us/politics/ transcript-debate.html.
The New York Times: Transcript of the second debate, October 10, 2016b. Retrieved on March 12, 2017 from https://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/10/us/politics/ transcript-second-debate.html?_r=0
The New York Times: Transcript of the third debate, October 20, 2016c. Retrieved on March 12, 2017 from https://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/20/us/politics/ third-debate-transcript.html?_r=0
Yaseen, A. Hasani, Ali, A. M., & Kasim, Z. M. (2018). Immigration in the United States 2016 Presidential Debates: A Functional Analysis. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 7(3), 41-48.
Zarefsky, D. (2016). How It All Began: The Origins of Presidential Campaigning in the United States. Praeger Handbook of Political Campaigning in the United States, 1.