Fashion and Feminism: A Theoretical and Historical Background
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The study explores the relationship between fashion and feminism. Throughout history, fashion has been considered as a mechanism of oppression, focusing on the historical role of restrictive garments such as corsets in the objectification of women due to patriarchal influence and societal norms. In the context of corsetry, the paper traces the origins of these garments and their role in physically and metaphorically constraining women to fit into the narrow and idealized standards of beauty dictated by patriarchal societies. It delves into how these oppressive clothing items have been portrayed in literary texts, highlighting the struggles of female protagonists against societal constraints. The study further examines how the feminist movement has actively challenged and rejected these restrictive garments, defying norms and advocating for women's autonomy in clothing choices. The analysis of literary works from various eras reveals how authors have captured and critiqued the oppressive nature of these garments, exposing the damaging effects on women's physical well-being. The study further explores the performative aspects of fashion within the context of patriarchy, drawing upon Judith Butler's theory of performativity to critically analyze the ways in which gender is constructed and reinforced through clothing. The study then delves into the contemporary portrayal of clothing as a means of empowerment and autonomy for women, with focus on chick lit genre. It discusses how authors within this genre have utilized fashion as a form of self-expression, empowerment, and agency.
Metrics
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Bordo, S. (1993). Unbearable weight: Feminism, western culture, and the body. University of California Press.
Brontë, C. (1847). Jane Eyre. Smith, Elder and Co.
Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge.
Butler, J. (1990). Performative acts and gender constitution: An essay in phenomenology and feminist theory. In Performing feminism: Feminist critical theory and theatre. John Hopkins UP.
Cheng, A. A. (2000). Wounded beauty: An exploratory essay on race, feminism, and the aesthetic question. The Tulsa Studies in Women’s Literature, 191-217.
Conely, D. (2017). You may ask yourself: An introduction to thinking like a sociologist. W. W. Norton& Company.
Crane, D. (2000). Fashion and its social agenda: Class, gender, and identity in clothing. University of Chicago.
Cunningham, P. A. (2003). Reforming women’s fashion. The Kent State University Press.
de Beauvoir, S. (2010). The second sex. (C. Borde & S. Malovany-Chevallier, Trans.). Knopf.
Ewing, E. (1992). History of twentieth century fashion. Barnes & Noble Books.
Genz, S., & Brabon, B. A. (2009). Postfeminism: Cultural texts and theories. Edinburg University Press.
Glasscock, J. (2004, September 13). Twentieth-century silhouette and support. The Costume Institute and The Metropolitan Museum of Art. https://www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/19sil/hd_19sil.htm.
Grosz, E. (1994). Volatile bodies: Towards a corporeal feminism. Indiana University Press.
Harzewski, S. (2011). Chick lit and postfeminism. University of Virginia Press.
Haslanger, S., Tuana, N., & O’Connor, p. (2012). Topics in feminism. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/feminism-topics/
Hillman, L. B. (2013). The clothes I wear help me to know my own power: The politics of gender presentation in the era of women’s liberation. Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies, 34(2), 155-185.
https://doi.org/10.5250/fronjwomestud.34.2.0155.
James, H. (1881). The portrait of a lady. Macmillan and Co.
Joelle, M. (2017). Amelia Bloomer introduced the first gender-nonconforming fashion in 1851. https://afterellen.com/amelia-bloomer-introduced-first-gender-nonconforming-fashion-1851/.
Kotz, L. (1992). The body you want: Liz Kotz interviews Judith Butler. Artforum, 31(3). https://www.artforum.com/print/199209/the-body-you-want-an-inteview-with-judith-butler-33505.
Kaiser, S. B. (1997). The social psychology of clothing: Symbolic appearance in context. Fairchild.
Konig, A. (2004). Sex and City: A fashion editor’s dream. In K. Akass & J. McCbe (Eds.), Reading Sex and City (pp. 130-143). I.B Tauris.
Lauer, J. C., & Lauer, R. H. (1981). Fashion power: The meaning of fashion in American society. Prentice Hall Direct.
McRobbie, A. (1997). Bridging the gap: Feminism, fashion, and consumption. Feminist Review, 55, 73-89.
McRobbie, A. (2004). Postfeminism and popular culture in feminist media studies. Routledge.
Nergin, L. (2008). Appearance and identity; Fashioning the body in postmodernity. Palgrave Macmillan.
Riegel, R. E. (1963). Women’s clothes and women’s rights. American Quarterly, 15(3), 390–401. https://doi.org/10.2307/2711370.
Standish, R. A. (2000). What is modish is doomed: Fashion and American feminism from the 1910s to the early 1930s. [PhD dissertation, University of Southern California].
Steele, V. (2001). The cultural history of the corset. Yale UP.
Strassel, A. (2013). Designing women: Feminist methodologies in American fashion. Women’s Studies Quarterly, 41(1/2), 35–59. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23611770.
Tong, R. (2009). Feminist thought. Westview Press.
Wagner, J. M. (2016). The conventional and the queer; Lily Bart, an unlivable ideal. Substance, 45(1), 116-39.
Wharton, E. (1905). The house of mirth. Charles Scribner’s Sons.
“The Gibson Girl as the ‘New Woman’” (2013). The Gibson Girl’s America: Drawings by Charles Dana Gibson. Exhibition at the Library of Congress. https://www.loc.gov/exhibits/gibson-girlsamerica/.
Wollstonecraft, M. (1792). A vindication of the rights of woman: With strictures on political and moral subjects. Printed for J. Johnson.
Wolf, N. (2002). The beauty myth: How images of beauty are used against women. Harper Collins