The Effectiveness of Multisensory Approach for Teaching EFL on Intermediate School Students
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The current study aims at finding out the effectiveness of the Multisensory Approach for teaching EFL on intermediate school students through finding out :
- the average level of students' achievement in English.
- whether there is any significant difference between the achievement of the experimental group and that of the control group in the posttest.
These aims have been achieved through verifying the following hypotheses:
- The average level of the students’ achievement in the posttest is within the theoretical level of performance in English.
- There is no significant difference between the mean scores of the experimental group’s achievement and that of the control group’s achievement in the posttest.
Metrics
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
College of Education for Humanities, TIKRIT UNIVERSITY. THIS IS AN OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE UNDER THE CC BY LICENSE http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
References
● Alvi ,M. H. (2016): “A Manual for Selecting Sampling Techniques in Research”. Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/70218/ MPRA Paper, 70218 , 1-56.
● Al-Zahrani, M. A. B. (2011) The Effectiveness of Keyword-Based Instruction in Enhancing English Vocabulary Achievement and Retention of Intermediate Stage Pupils with Different Working Memory Capacities.(Online Submission M.Ed. Thesis) Taif University.
● Best, John W.(1981) Research in Education .(4th ed.) . Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey : Prentice – Hall,Inc.
● Birsh ,R. Judith (2018) Multisensory Teaching of Basic Language Skills.(4th ed.),London: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.www.brookespublishing.com .
● Blomert,L and Froyen, D. (2010) “MultiSensory Learning and Learning to Read”. International Journal of Psychophysiology,77(3)September PP-195-204[3].
● Brown ,H. (2000) Principles of Language Teaching and Learning, (4th ed.). New York: Addison Wesley Longman.Inc .
● Fry , Lawrence R.; Carl , H. Boton; and Gnry L. Kreps. (2000) Investigating Communication : An Introduction to Research Methods ( 2nd ed. ). Boston : Allyn and Bacon .
● Gillingham,Oarton(2019)Multisensory Instruction in the Classroom Activities to Use.25,2019 122 38.
● Haddon,Robinson and Torrey Robinson (2003) It’s All in How You Tell It: Preaching First-Person Expository Messages (Grand Rapids: Baker, 9).
● Heaton, J. B. (1988) Writing English Language Test (2nd ed.). New York: Longman Group UK Limited.
● Herrell ,A. and Jordan,M.(2001) “Collecting and Processing Words :Strategies for Building Vocabulary in Young Children . Kindergarten Education : Research and Practice , 3 , 17-25.
● Lehman, Irvin and Mehrens, A. (1971). Educational Research Reading in Focus. USA.: American Winston, Inc.
● Madsen, H.S. (1983). Techniques in Testing. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
● Majeed ,N .T. and Jasim K. “An Evaluation of the English Teacher -Made Tests for the Fifth Preparatory Class of Iraqi Schools”Journal of Tikrit University Vol (29) No (3) Vol (2) Mars 2022.
● McIntyre, C., & Pickering, J. (2001) “Clinical Studies of Multisensory Structured Language Education”.International Multisensory Structured Language Education Council, Dallas.
● McNamara, T. (2000). Language Testing. Oxford: Oxford University press.
● Molholm; Sophie ;Walter Ritter; Daniel C. Javittand and John J. Foxe(2004) “Multisensory Visual-Auditory Object Recognition in Humans: a Highdensity Electrical Mapping Study.” Journal of Cerebral Cortex vo14,no.4 ,pp 452–65.
● Richards, J .C. and Schmidt, R. (2010) Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching& Applied Linguistics (4th ed.) UK :Longman Publishing Group.
● White, V.R. (1988) The ELT Curriculum. Oxford University : Basil Blackwell Ltd.