Main Article Content

Hasan Shaban Ali Al Thalab
hasanshali7392@yahoo.com
May Basil Alwan
hasanshali7392@yahoo.com

Abstract

The recent paper centers on reporting the error in the production, perception and identification of segmental phonemes of both Arabic and English. Formerly Arabic learners may come across many difficulties in the recognition and pronunciation a foreign language, such as English, due to the enormous variations, principally, in vowels and consonants inventory and their acoustic realizations. It also examines gender influence on learners' performance in three tasks. The total number of subjects are (36) Iraqi EFL learners; categorized into six groups based on their education proficiency levels. MP3 recording device is used in the tasks to record learners' pronunciation. The list of tested words contains (20) words that exemplify simple, long vowels and semi vowels. The results revealed that most Iraqi L2 learners have problems in articulating short and long English vowels and they come across fluctuating gradations of difficulty. The results also show that there is an effect of the level of education on the accuracy rate for some vowel categories. The most problematic vowels were /ɒ, ʌ, ɔ: / which were difficult for most subjects regardless their education level and proficiency in English.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

How to Cite
Al Thalab, H. S. A., & Alwan, M. B. (2022). Production, Perception and Identification of English and Arabic Vowels and Semi-vowels by Iraqi Arabic EFL Learners. Journal of Tikrit University for Humanities, 29(1, 2), 49–67. https://doi.org/10.25130/jtuh.29.1.2.2022.22
Section
Articles

References

Al-Badawi, M. A., & Salim, J. A. (2014). The perception of English vowels by Arab EFL learners: a case study of university students at Zarqa University. Perception, 4(20).

Alduais, A. M. (2015). An account of phonetics and phonology as similar identical or different. The International Journal of Indian Psychology, 3(1), 157-165.

Alqarni, H. (2018). Production of English vowels by native Arabic speakers, The (Doctoral dissertation, Colorado State University).

Al-Zoubi, M. (2019). The speech sounds of Arabic language and their effect on learning English pronunciation: A contrastive analysis. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 9(1), 15-27.

Amer, W. (2012). An investigation into the differences between English and Arabic consonant and vowel sounds: A Contrastive study with pedagogical implications. Zaqaziq University Journal of Education, 8(1), 1-18.

Calet, N., Gutiérrez-Palma, N., Simpson, I. C., González-Trujillo, M. C., & Defior, S. (2015). Suprasegmental phonology development and reading acquisition: A longitudinal study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 19(1), 51-71.

Collins, B., & Mees, I. M. (2013). Practical phonetics and phonology: A resource book for students. Routledge.

Cowan, W. (2011). Rules and counter-rules in historical phonology. In General and Theoretical Linguistics (pp. 85-92). De Gruyter Mouton.

Gilakjani, A. P. (2012). A study of factors affecting EFL learners' English pronunciation learning and the strategies for instruction. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(3), 119-128.

Gimson, A. C. (1984). The RP accent. Language in the British Isles, 1, 45-54.

Hago, O., & Khan, W. (2015). The pronunciation problems faced by Saudi EFL learners at secondary schools. Education and Linguistics Research, 1(2), 85-99.

Hamid, I., & Ali, S. (2020). Agentive Forms Formation in English and Arabic. Adab AL Rafidayn, 50(81).

Havlíková, P. (2020). Production Accuracy in L2 English Checked Vowels: Cross-sectional Study of Czech Secondary and Post-Secondary School Students.

Hismanoglu, M. (2012). An investigation of phonological awareness of prospective EFL teachers. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 639-645.

Hitch, D. (2017). Vowel spaces and systems. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics, 38.

Holliman, A. J. (2016). Suprasegmental phonology and early reading development: Examining the relative contribution of sensitivity to stress, intonation and timing. Trends in language acquisition research series: Linguistic rhythm and literacy, 25-50.

Huthaily, K. (2003). Contrastive phonological analysis of Arabic and English.

Ismail, J. H. (2017). Impact of Phonological Processes of Vowel Shortening on Standard Kiswahili.

Kalaldeh, R. (2018). Acoustic analysis of Modern Standard Arabic vowels by Jordanian speakers. International Journal of Arabic-English Studies, 18(1), 23-48.

Kang, O., & Johnson, D. (2018). The roles of suprasegmental features in predicting English oral proficiency with an automated system. Language Assessment Quarterly, 15(2), 150-168.

Ladefoged, P. (2004). Phonetics and phonology in the last 50 years. UCLA working papers in phonetics, 103, 1-11.

Mahmoud, A. (2000). Modern Standard Arabic vs. Non-Standard Arabic: where do Arab students of EFL transfer from?. Language culture and curriculum, 13(2), 126-136.

Roach, P. (2010). English phonetics and phonology fourth edition: A practical course. Ernst Klett Sprachen.

Roach, P., Hartman, J., & Setter, J. (1997). English Pronouncing Dictionary (Daniel Jones. Cambridge: CUP.

Sabir, I., & Alsaeed, N. H. (2014). Disquisition of Long and Short Vowels in Colloquial Arabic. International Proceedings of Economics Development and Research, 79, 32.

Salameh, M. Y. B., & Abu-Melhim, A. R. (2014). The phonetic nature of vowels in Modern Standard Arabic. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 5(4), 60-67.

Watson, J. C. (2002). The phonology and morphology of Arabic. Oxford University Press on Demand.

Wells, J. C. (1980). AC Gimson, An Introduction to the pronunciation of English. (Pp. xvi+ 352. Edward Arnold, London, 1980.). Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 10(1-2), 80-81.

Worthy, J., & Viise, N. M. (1996). Morphological, phonological, and orthographic differences between the spelling of normally achieving children and basic literacy adults. Reading and Writing, 8(2), 139-159.

Zhang, L. (2004). Awareness-raising in the TEFL phonology classroom: Student voices and sociocultural and psychological considerations. ITL-International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 145(1), 219-268.