The Effect of LEED's Strategy and Conceptual Change on the Development of Deductive Thinking among Literary Fifth-grade Students
Main Article Content
Abstract
The current research aims to identify (the effect of LEED's strategy and the conceptual change in developing their deductive thinking among fifth-grade literary students). To achieve the goal of the research, the researcher adopted the experimental design with equivalent groups. The day unit of the General Directorate of Education in Salah al-Din Governorate - Balad Education Department for the academic year (2019-2020). The research sample amounted to (86) students: (27) students for the first experimental group that studied the LEED strategy, (28) students in the second experimental group that was studied according to the conceptual change strategy, and (31) students for the control group that studied in the usual way. The researcher rewarded between the research groups in the following variables (chronological age calculated in months, IQ scores, previous achievement in Arabic language and academic achievement of students' parents and deductive reasoning scores in the pretest). The researcher also determined the scientific material, which is the first five topics in the book of rhetoric. The researcher prepared the deductive reasoning test consisting of (10) positions by (30) paragraphs, and after verifying his apparent validity by presenting it to a group of referees specialized in curricula and teaching methods, and it was applied to two samples Two surveys, one to find out the clarity of the paragraphs and the response time, and the other for the purpose of statistically analyzing the test items and calculating its psychometric properties, as the data were analyzed and processed statistically by adopting the SPSS statistical bag. The researcher studied the research groups himself, and the experiment lasted (13) weeks of the academic year (2019-2020), and at the end of the experiment the researcher applied the two research tools, the conceptual acquisition test and the dimensional deductive reasoning test, and after correcting the results and analyzing them statistically using the (t-test) test showed The following results: -
1- There is no statistically significant difference at the level of (0.05) between the mean scores of the students of the first experimental group who studied the rhetoric using the LEED strategy and the average scores of the students of the second experimental group who studied using the strategy of (conceptual change) in the deductive reasoning test.
2- There is a statistically significant difference at the level of (0.05) between the mean scores of the students of the first experimental group who studied the rhetoric subject using the LEED strategy and the average scores of the students of the control group who studied using (the usual method) in the deductive reasoning test in favor of the first experimental group in favor of the group First pilot.
3- There is a statistically significant difference at the level of (0.05) between the mean scores of the students of the second experimental group who studied the rhetoric subject using the strategy of (conceptual change) and the average scores of the students of the control group who studied using the (the usual method) in the deductive reasoning test in favor of the second experimental group.
4- There is a statistically significant difference at the level of (0.05) between the mean scores of the students of the first experimental group who studied rhetoric using the LEED strategy in the pre and post test for inferential thinking in favor of the post test.
5- There is a statistically significant difference at the level of (0.05) between the mean scores of the second experimental group students who studied the rhetoric subject using the strategy of (conceptual change) in the pre and post test for inferential thinking in favor of the post test.
Metrics
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
College of Education for Humanities, TIKRIT UNIVERSITY. THIS IS AN OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE UNDER THE CC BY LICENSE http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
References
Hamida, Imam Mukhtar and Others (2000), Teaching Social Studies in General Education, Part 1, Zahraa Al Sharq Library, Cairo.
Al-Khaza'leh, Salman Muhammad Fayyad and others (2010), Effective Teaching Methods, Dar Safa.
Al-Saleem, Malak Muhammad (1996), Evaluation of Chemical Concepts for First Year Secondary Students in Riyadh, Risalah Al-Arabi Journal, Issue (57).
Shehata, Hassan and others (2000), Teaching Arabic Language between Theory and Practice, 4th Edition, Dar Al-Masria Al-Lebnani, Cairo.
Abdul-Bari, Maher Shaaban (2011), Vocabulary Teaching Strategies, 1st Edition, Dar Al-Masirah for Publishing and Distribution, Amman, Jordan.
bdel Salam, Mustafa Abdel Salam (2001): Modern trends in science teaching, 1st Edition, Dar Al Fikr Al Arabi, Cairo.
Abdullah, Abd al-Rahman Salih, the reference in the teaching of Sharia sciences, Faculty of Educational Sciences, University of Jordan, Amman, 1994.
Afaneh, Izzo (2001), The interrelation between conceptual knowledge and procedural knowledge in teaching and learning mathematics, Palestinian Educational Research Journal, Issue (5).
Al-Omar, Badr Omar (1990). The learner in educational psychology, 1st Edition, Kuwait.
Al-Fakhry, Salameh (1973): Forming the Concepts of Measurement in Children, Baghdad, Educational and Psychological Research Center.
Qatami, Yusef (2000): Teaching Design, 1st Edition, Amman, Dar Al-Fikr for Printing, Publishing and Distribution.
Muhammad, Rifat Mahmoud (1998), the effect of using conceptual change strategies in developing the level of knowledge, application and retention of heat concepts among third year students, Journal of Educational Sciences, College of Education in Qena, Issue (10).
Marei, Tawfiq and Muhammad Mahmoud Al-Hailah (2005): General Teaching Methods, Amman, Dar Al-Masirah for Publishing and Distribution.
Al-Momani, Ibrahim and others (2003), Teaching science through alternative ideas carried on the surface of the primary stage, Educational Sciences Studies, Volume (29), Issue (1).
Nashwan, Yaqoub, (1993), “Single Education between Theory and Practice”, Amman, Dar Al-Furqan for Publishing and Distribution.
Shehata, Hassan (1992), Teaching Arabic Language between Theory and Practice, The Egyptian Lebanese House, Cairo, Egypt.
Bin Rajab, Rafiqa, between the terms eloquence and rhetoric, Al-Jandoul Magazine, Journal of Human Sciences, Fourth Year, Issue 29, July, July, 2006.
Al-Azzawi, Faizah Muhammad Fakhri (1998), The difficulties of teaching rhetoric among students of Arabic language departments in the Faculties of Education in Baghdad, University of Baghdad, College of Education, Ibn Rushd.
Al-Obeidi, Ruqayya Abdul-Imam (2000), The Impact of Teaching Rhetoric by Exploration Method on Achievement and Transmission of the Effect of Learning and Retaining it among Fifth-Grade Literary Students, (Unpublished PhD Thesis) College of Education, Ibn Rushd, University of Baghdad.
Al-Janabi, Intisar Abd al-Hamza Kata (2003), The Effect of Hildatapa, Merle and Tenson Models on Acquisition and Retention of Rhetorical Concepts of Fifth-Grade Literary Students, University of Baghdad - College of Education (Ibn Rushd) (unpublished doctoral thesis).
Al-Hamiri, Hadeel Hamid Alou (2002), The Effect of Using Jane’s and Klose Mayer Models on Acquisition of Rhetorical Concepts among Fifth Grade Literary Students, Diyala University - Teachers College (unpublished master's thesis).
Al-Rufou`, Yusef Abdul-Karim Hasan, The Effect of Using the Two Methods of Induction and Measurement on the Achievement of Rhetoric for First-Year Secondary Students in Jordan, (Unpublished Master Thesis, College of Education, Ibn Rushd, University of Baghdad, 2001.
Abbas, Muhammad Khalil and others (2006), Introduction to Research Methods in Education and Psychology, 3rd Edition, Dar Al-Maisarah for Printing, Publishing and Distribution, Amman, Jordan.
Al-Afoun, Nadia and Abdel-Saheb, Muntaha (2012), Thinking patterns, theories and methods of teaching and learning, Dar Al-Safa for Publishing and Distribution, Amman.
Razooqi, Raad Mahdi and others (2019), Educational Models - Learning in Science Teaching, 1st Edition, Adel Office for Printing and Publishing, Baghdad - Iraq.
Saadeh, Jawdat Ahmed and others, (2008), Cooperative Learning, Theories, Applications and Studies, 1st Edition, Wael House, Cairo.
Driver, R., & Easley, J., (1978)." Pupils and paradigms: A review of literature related to concept development in adolescent science students". Studies in Science Education , 5, PP( 61-84) .
Vosniadou, S., (2002)." Exploring the Relationships between Conceptual Change and Intentional Learning." In G.M. Sinatra, & P.R. Pintrich (Eds.), Intentional Conceptual Change .PP(.377-406).