A Pragmatic Analysis of Communicative Silence in Natural Interactions: ‘Mona Lisa Smile’ Movie as a Case Study
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study is mainly devoted to prove that „silence‟ (in natural language interaction) is not only a mere absence of words, but it is also an act which implies a communicative meaning. It is hypothesized that silence can be used as a tool of communication in the same way that speech does. It is also hypothesized that the EFL students are unaware of the many interpretations and functions of silence. Therefore, it is important to know the main premises of this subject, and to find a way to correctly determine and interpret silence in natural interactions.
To achieve the main aim of this study, Schroter‟s (2013) relevance theoretic model is followed. This model is thought to be the best to exactly determine silence together with its communicative intentions and functions in the data selected. This model is based on three main criteria: intention, expectation and relevance. The data of this study is represented by natural interactions taken from the famous movie „Mona Lisa Smile‟.
Metrics
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
College of Education for Humanities, TIKRIT UNIVERSITY. THIS IS AN OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE UNDER THE CC BY LICENSE http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
References
Barron, Ann and Schneider, Klaus (2014): Pragmatics of Discourse. Berlin, Walter de Gruyter Gmbh.
Cummings, Louise (2010): The Pragmatics Encyclopedia. USA, Routledge.
Dinkler, Michal Beth (2013): Silent Statements. Berlin, Walter de Gruyter.
Gal, Susan (1989) : “Between Speech and Silence: The problematics of research on language and gender”. In: Pragmatics, Vol. (3), No. (1), pp. 1-38.
Green, Eugene (2007): “Patterns of Seeking and Breaking Silence in Earlier English”. In: Cain, Christopher M. and Russom, Geoffrey (Eds.): Studies in the History of the English Language. Vol. (3). Berlin, Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 216-229.
Huszar, Orsolya (2016): “The Role of Silence at the Retreats of a Buddhist Community”. Corvinus University of Budapest, Institute of Behavioural Sciences and Communication, pp. 59-73.
Jaworski, Adam (1993): The Power of Silence: Social and Pragmatic Perspectives. London, SAGE Publications.
________ (1997): Silence: Studies in Anthropological Linguistics. Berlin, Walter de Gruyter & Co.
Jeffries, J; Mcintyre, D and Bousfield, D. (2007): Stylistics and Social Cognition. The Netherlands, Rodopi B.V.
Jensen, J. (1973). “Communicative functions of silence”: In: A Review of General Semantics, Vol. (30), No. (3), pp. 249–257.
Kurzon, Dennis (1998): Discourse of Silence. Philadelphia, John Benjamins B.V.
Schroter, Melani (2013): Silence and Concealment in Political Discourse. Philadelphia, John Benjamins B.V.
Trandafir, Laura I. (2018): Silence in Virtual Meetings: The Case of Virtual Business Professional Project. University of Jaume I.