Pragmatics of Arrogance in Trump's "America First" Foreign Policy Speech
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Arrogance is a human psychological belief of being on the top of all things. This means that an arrogant person sees himself as the center around which others revolve. Pragmatically, arrogance can be seen in terms of language use, that is, an arrogant person likes to resort to certain pragmatic strategies to appear as a person who is superior to others. There is no limit to which pragmatic strategies arrogant people might rely on. Nevertheless, some of these strategies can be investigated in a certain illustrative example which can be culled from a certain context. It seems, as observed by this study, that this topic has not been given its scholarly pragmatic attention. To bridge this gap in the literature, a certain type of data can be scrutinized to discover the pragmatic aspects of arrogance in it. In this respect, the present study sets itself the task of pragmatically dealing with this particular issue. To attain this goal, this work attempts to answer the following question: What is the pragmatics of arrogance in Trump's "America First" foreign policy speech? In association with this aim, it is hypothesized that Donald Trump uses certain pragmatic strategies which reveal his arrogant nature. In this regard, he is expected to employ commissure speech acts such as threats and promises, and exploit different types of devices to trigger presuppositions of various types. Besides, he appeals to some pragmatic functions of exaggeration. In order to achieve the aim of the paper and verify or reject its hypothesis, an analytical pragmatic framework is developed to analyze the data under scrutiny. Additionally, a statistical method represented by the percentage equation is used to calculate the results. The most important finding arrived at by this study is that Donald Trump most often resorts to the strategies of promising and threatening. Furthermore, he uses presupposition triggers, and resorts to exaggeration through exploiting the devices of repetition and manipulation.
Metrics
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
College of Education for Humanities, TIKRIT UNIVERSITY. THIS IS AN OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE UNDER THE CC BY LICENSE http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
References
- Abbott, Barbara (2006). Reference. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Beniot, W.L. (2007). Communication in Political Campaigns. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
- Bauer, J., Cho, E., Johnson, R. E., & Silverman, S. B. (2008). Acting superior but actually inferior? Relationships of arrogance with motivation and cognitive ability. Paper presented at the 2008 Southern Management Association Meeting, St. Pete Beach, FL. Retrieved from: https://www.slideshare.net/CllrMirfin/political-arrogance
- Benoit, William L., Pier, P. M., Brazeal, Leann M., Mchale, John P., Klyukovski, A., Airne, D. (2002). The Primary Decision: A Functional Analysis of Debates in Presidential Primaries. Westport: Praeger Publishers.
- Coulthard, M. (1985). An Introduction to Discourse Analysis. Oxon: Routledge.
- Cruse, Alan (2006). A Glossary of Semantics and Pragmatics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
- Draitser, E.(1994). Techniques of Satire. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
- Dudek, P. and Partacz, S. (2009). Functional Theory of Political Discourse Televised Debates during Parliamentary Campaign in 2007 in Poland. Central European Journal of Communication, 2 ( 2009) ISSN 1899-5101
- Fogelin , Robert J.(1988). Figuratively Speaking. London: Yale University Press.
- https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/arrogance
- Huang, Yan (2014). Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Mirfin, Ged (2017). Political Arrogance. News & Politics.
- R.M. Weischedel. (1979). A New Semantic Computation while Parsing: Presupposition and Entailment. In Oh C.K. and Dinneen D.A, editors, Synta Semantics, Presupposition, volume 11. Academic Press.
- Shehu, Fahredin (2018). Politics, Religion, Arrogance, State. Center for promotion of intercultural dialogue: Mother Theresa Street- Prishtina- Kosovë. Retrieved from: https://docgo.net/philosophy-of- money.html?utm_source=politics-religion-arrogance-state&utm_campaign=download
- Stuhr, John J. (2016). Pragmatic Fashions: Pluralism, Democracy, Relativism, and the Absurd. Indiana: Indiana University Press.
- Van Der Sandt, Rob A. (1988). Context and Presupposition. California: Croom Helm.
- Van Dijk, T. A. 2006. Discourse and Manipulation. London: Sage.
- Verstraete, J-C (2005). The Semantics and Pragmatics of Composite Mood Marking: The non-Pama-Nyungan languages of northern Australia. Retrieved from: https://lirias.kuleuven.be/bitstream/123456789/245297/2/lt-2005-jcv.pdf
- Wilson, John (2015). Talking with the President: The Pragmatics of Presidential Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Yule, G. (2000) Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Transcript of the Trump's Speech retrieved from:
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/28/us/politics/transcript-trump-foreign-policy.html