The Sufficiency and Efficiency of the New Curriculum of English Language (EL) in the College of Administrative and Financial Sciences. A Case Study at Cihan University
Main Article Content
Abstract
ESP (English for Specific Purposes) and ESL (English as a Second Language) have been for many years a material of controversial discussion. The most important difference lies in the learners and their purposes for learning English. ESP students are usually adults who already have some acquaintance with English and are learning the language in order to communicate a set of professional skills and to perform particular job-related functions. An ESP programme is therefore built on an assessment of purposes and needs and the functions for which English is required ( Fiorito, 2005).
This study has been conducted to investigate the opinions of ESP lecturers in four departments in addition to fifty students from each department about adapting an ESP curriculum instead of the general one by two questionnaires for the two parties. The problem of the study has been stated with a literature review. The purpose of the study has been illustrated in addition to the methodology adopted in data collection and it is supported by tables and charts. Conclusions have been drawn at the end of the study.
The method used in conducting the study is applied by collecting data from two different questionnaires distributed to lecturers and to students as well. All lectures who teach English in the four departments have answered this questionnaire. The sample of students is 50 students from each department from the 2nd year. So, the total number is 200 students.
Metrics
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
College of Education for Humanities, TIKRIT UNIVERSITY. THIS IS AN OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE UNDER THE CC BY LICENSE http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
References
Dudley Evans and St. John (1998) Developments in English for Specific
Purposes. A Multi-Disciplinary Approach
Cambridge: CUP. 301 pp. ISBN 0 521 59675-0 (Paperback)/0 52159329-8 (Hardback)
Ewer and Latorre. (1969), Swales (1971), Selinker and Trimble (1976) and others https://webs.um.es/paguado/miwiki/lib/exe/fetch.php?id=ife_1&cached The Origins of ESP
Fiorito, Lorenzo . (2005). Teaching English for Specific Purposes (ESP): How is English for Specific Purposes (ESP) different from English as a Second Language (ESL), also known as General English?
Gatehouse Kristen , Key Issues in English for Specific Purposes (ESP): Curriculum: Development .iteslj.org/Articles/Gatehouse-ESP.html
The intent of this paper is to provide the ESL instructor as ESP course designer
Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for Specific Purposes: A learning-centered approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Johns, A., & Dudley-Evans, T. (1991). English for Specific Purposes: International in scope, specific in purpose. TESOL Quarterly, 25, 297-314.
Nunan, D. (1987). The Teacher as Curriculum Developer: An investigation of curriculum processes within the Adult Migrant Education Program. South Australia: National Curriculum Resource Centre.
www.khae-service.com The Internet TESL Journal