Advising in the Glorious Qur’an as A Direct Strategy of Speech Acts
Main Article Content
Abstract
Advising speech act is classified, within the category of advisory speech acts, which, is also considered, to be a category, of directives. Advisories ,are relying on the attitudes that are expressed, what the speaker expresses, is a kind of belief, which implies that performing an action is a good idea, which is in the hearer's interest. The speaker also has an ,intention that ,his belief will be ,taken by the hearer as a reason to conduct the action. The current study is focusing on advising in the Glorious Qur’an trying to shed light on the direct strategies that are used in introducing it. The study also, aims at discovering the significance of advising in the Glorious Qur’an. To achieve these aims, the study hypothesized that most of the direct strategies have the explicit utterances of “Advice” or any of its derivations. The study highlights the significant role that advice can play in the rehabilitation of individuals in any society as it represents one of the foundations of religion which is built on. It also concludes that advising speech act is comprehended explicitly as indicated in the selected data, that is to say, explicit expressions of advising are used where the word of advice or any of its derivations are used directly or in an explicit way. The study is hoped to supply students with a sufficient knowledge on the most direct ,strategies of giving ,advice in the Glorious Qur’an as a standard, of the Arabic language.
Metrics
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
● Al - Tabari, M..(2000). Jamie Albayan An Tawil Ay Alquran. Beirut:
Muasassat Alrisala.
● Al- Baghawi,A .(1999).Ihiaa Alturath . Beirut : Dar Ihiaa Alturath.
● Allan, K. (1986) Linguistic Meaning. Vol. 2. New York: Routledge &
Kegan Paul, Inc.
● ……….. (1997).”Indirect Speech Acts. In Peter V. Lamarque (ed.).Concise
Encyclopedia of Philosophy of Language. 401 - 403. United Kingdom: Elsevier Science Ltd”.
● Al-sha’arawy, M. (1991). Tafseer Al-sha’arawy.Egypt:Dar Akhbar Alyoum.
● AUSTIN, J. L. (1962): How To Do Things With Words, Oxford, The
Clarendon Press.
● Bach, K. and R. Harnish (1979) Linguistic Communication and Speech
Acts.Cambridge: The MIT Press.
● Cruse, Alan D. (2000). Meaning in Language: An Introduction to
Semantics and Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
● Habermas, J. (1998). Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action.
Cambridge. The MIT Press.
● Ibn -Atyah, A. (1998).Almuharir Alwajeez fi Tafsir Alkitab Alaziz. Beirut: Dar Alkutub Alilmyah.
● Leech, G. (2014).The Pragmatics of Politeness. New York. Oxford
University Press.
● Limberg, H.; and Locher, M. (Ed) (2012). Advice in Discourse.
Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
● Martinez-Flor, A. (2003). 'Non-Native Speakers' Production of Advice Acts: The Effects of Proficiency'. Castellon: University Jaume I, pp.
- 153.
● Mey, J. l. (1993) Pragmatics: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
● ………... (2001) Pragmatics An introduction. 2nd edition. Oxford:
Blackwell.
● Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of
Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
● ………… (1971) "What is a Speech Act". In J. Searle (ed.) The Philosophy
Of Language, pp.39-54.
● ………… (1979) Expression and Meaning. Cambridge:
University Press Cambridge.
● Thomson, A.j; and Martinet, A.V (1986). A Practical English Grammar.
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
● Verschueren, J. (1999) Understanding Pragmatics. London: Arnold.
● Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Website:
● Köning, Ekkehard, and Peter Siemund. 2007. “Speech Act Distinctions in Grammar ”in Timothy Shoppen (ed), Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.