INTERACTION ACTIVITIES EFFICACY ON LEARNERS GRAMMAR COMPETENCE
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to investigate the important of grammatical teaching approaches by making compare between two approaches; traditional and communicative approach. The study was guided by tests (pre-test and post-test). Furthermore; the objective of the study to identify the appropriate and affective approaches in teaching grammar. The main significant goal was to show which approach is appropriate to enable learners achieving linguistic competence. The sample of the study was number of students in second intermediate stage in Al Aadhmia School in Baghdad city. Based on the findings of the study the researcher has found out that, second language learners would benefit of applicant of both methods in teaching grammar and concerning with knowledge rather than the use of grammatical rules in communication.
Metrics
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
College of Education for Humanities, TIKRIT UNIVERSITY. THIS IS AN OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE UNDER THE CC BY LICENSE http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
References
Ellis, N. (1995). "Consciousness in second language learning: Review of field studies and laboratory experiments". Language awareness, 4. 3. 123 - 46.
Ellis, R. (1992). Second language acquisition and language pedagogy. Multilingual Matters.
Ellis, R. (2004). The definition and measurement of L2 explicit knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, (54), 227-275.
Hartwell, P. (1985). Grammar, grammars and the teaching of grammar. College English. Vol 47, no, 2: 105-127.
Horan, A. (2003). English grammar in schools. In P. Collins & M. Amberber (Eds),
Proceedings of the 2002 Conference of the Australian Linguistic Society.
James, C. (1980). Contrastive analysis. Longman.
Jin, L., Singh, M. &Li, L. (2005). Communicative Language Teaching in China: Misconceptions, Applications and Perceptions. A paper presented at AARE’ 05 Education Research “Creative Dissent: Constructive Solutions” the Australian Association for Research in Education.
Kellerman, E. (1983). 'If at first you do succeed in S. Gass and C. Madden (eds.). Input in Second Language Acquisition. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.
Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. New York. Pergaman.
Krashen, S. (1988). The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications. London: Longman.
Lado, R. (1957). Linguistics across cultures. University of Michigan Press.
Larsen-Freeman. D. (1991). Teaching Grammar, in Celce-Murcia M. (1991), Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language, (Second Edition), Boston MA: Heinle & Heinle.
Nunan, D. (1998). Teaching grammar in context. ELT Journal Volume 52/2 Oxford University Press.
Prabhu, N. S. (1987). "Second Language Pedagogy." Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sheen, R. (2007). Traditional grammar teaching. LINGUIST Issue: 18.1081. http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
Zhong-guo,L. & Min-yan, S.(2007). The Relationship between Traditional English Grammar Teaching and Communicative Language Teaching. Volume 4, No.1 (Serial No.26) US-China Education Review, ISSN1548-6613, USA.